Payne v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annunity and Benefit Fund
977 N.E.2d 1155
Ill. App. Ct.2012Background
- Payne, a firefighter and deputy district chief, injured his right shoulder on May 10, 2009, during a Fire Department training exercise in Chicago.
- He filed for a duty disability pension with the Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund on April 6, 2010.
- Initial treatment included imaging revealing a partial rotator cuff issue but no acute fracture, with cortisone injections and physical therapy.
- A November 2, 2009 functional capacity evaluation showed substantial lifting capability (below waist) and noted cardiovascular fatigue, suggesting work conditioning; permanent restrictions were later recommended.
- Dr. Bach placed permanent restrictions but allowed return to work with modifications; independent evaluation by Dr. Marra suggested arthroscopic repair could be pursued.
- The Retirement Board denied disability benefits; the circuit court affirmed; Payne appeals the decision.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Payne is disabled under 6-112 given his current duties | Payne cannot perform DDC duties in his current condition | Record shows Payne can perform DDC duties | Not disabled; evidence supports ability to perform DDC duties |
| Whether the Board correctly weighed medical evidence regarding disability without surgery | Surgery could restore function; refusal not decisive | Disability based on current functional capacity and available duties; surgery not required | Disability not established on current evidence; no reversal of Board’s finding |
| Whether a DDC position exists Payne can perform without surgery | Current restrictions prevent performing DDC duties | Job posting and medical evidence show DDC duties can be performed | Record supports availability of a DDC role Payne can perform without surgery |
Key Cases Cited
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 153 Ill. 2d 76 (1992) (administrative review standard; findings prima facie true; weigh evidence not reweighed on review)
- Peterson v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Pension Fund, 54 Ill. 2d 260 (1973) (disability not automatic upon loss of firefighter duties; must show inability to perform any assigned duty)
- Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 234 Ill. 2d 446 (2009) (ability to work in a different position may defeat disability)
- Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension Board, 225 Ill. 2d 497 (2006) (credibility and weight of evidence; board findings given deference on review)
- Reyes v. Walker, 358 Ill. App. 3d 1122 (2005) (affirming on any basis supported by the record)
