History
  • No items yet
midpage
Payne v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annunity and Benefit Fund
977 N.E.2d 1155
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Payne, a firefighter and deputy district chief, injured his right shoulder on May 10, 2009, during a Fire Department training exercise in Chicago.
  • He filed for a duty disability pension with the Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund on April 6, 2010.
  • Initial treatment included imaging revealing a partial rotator cuff issue but no acute fracture, with cortisone injections and physical therapy.
  • A November 2, 2009 functional capacity evaluation showed substantial lifting capability (below waist) and noted cardiovascular fatigue, suggesting work conditioning; permanent restrictions were later recommended.
  • Dr. Bach placed permanent restrictions but allowed return to work with modifications; independent evaluation by Dr. Marra suggested arthroscopic repair could be pursued.
  • The Retirement Board denied disability benefits; the circuit court affirmed; Payne appeals the decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Payne is disabled under 6-112 given his current duties Payne cannot perform DDC duties in his current condition Record shows Payne can perform DDC duties Not disabled; evidence supports ability to perform DDC duties
Whether the Board correctly weighed medical evidence regarding disability without surgery Surgery could restore function; refusal not decisive Disability based on current functional capacity and available duties; surgery not required Disability not established on current evidence; no reversal of Board’s finding
Whether a DDC position exists Payne can perform without surgery Current restrictions prevent performing DDC duties Job posting and medical evidence show DDC duties can be performed Record supports availability of a DDC role Payne can perform without surgery

Key Cases Cited

  • Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 153 Ill. 2d 76 (1992) (administrative review standard; findings prima facie true; weigh evidence not reweighed on review)
  • Peterson v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Pension Fund, 54 Ill. 2d 260 (1973) (disability not automatic upon loss of firefighter duties; must show inability to perform any assigned duty)
  • Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 234 Ill. 2d 446 (2009) (ability to work in a different position may defeat disability)
  • Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension Board, 225 Ill. 2d 497 (2006) (credibility and weight of evidence; board findings given deference on review)
  • Reyes v. Walker, 358 Ill. App. 3d 1122 (2005) (affirming on any basis supported by the record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Payne v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annunity and Benefit Fund
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Sep 18, 2012
Citation: 977 N.E.2d 1155
Docket Number: 1-11-2435
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.