History
  • No items yet
midpage
Paulson v. Paulson
801 N.W.2d 746
| N.D. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mark and Cheryl Paulson married in 1994, separated in 2006, and Mark filed for divorce in 2008.
  • The district court granted the divorce, divided property, and denied spousal support in the first judgment.
  • On Cheryl’s appeal, this Court affirmed the property division but reversed and remanded for proper Ruff-Fischer analysis on spousal support.
  • On remand, the district court issued amended findings and awarded Cheryl $1,500 per month permanent spousal support.
  • The court analyzed the Ruff-Fischer factors, noting long marriage, significant income disparity (Mark ~$53k vs Cheryl ~$23k), and Mark’s dissipation of assets.
  • Mark challenged remand procedures; the court allowed fuller findings and accepted the income figures, with issues not raised on remand not to be raised on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the spousal support findings were clearly erroneous Paulson contends the findings misstate income and needs Paulson argues the district court correctly applied Ruff-Fischer factors Findings not clearly erroneous; support awarded
Whether issues raised for the first time on appeal were properly preserved Paulson did not present certain income issues in remand Issues not raised below cannot be raised on appeal Preservation requirement respected; new arguments not considered
Whether Cheryl’s request for attorney fees and sanctions should be granted Paulson’s appeal is frivolous; fees justified No sanction or fees warranted; appendix rules not violated grossly Requests denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Duff v. Kearns-Duff, 2010 ND 247 (N.D. 2010) (Ruff-Fischer factors and income/needs analysis in spousal support)
  • Peterson v. Peterson, 2010 ND 165 (N.D. 2010) (guidance on spousal support considerations)
  • Beeter v. Sawyer Disposal LLC, 2009 ND 153 (N.D. 2009) (issues not raised below cannot be raised on appeal)
  • Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc., 2011 ND 94 (N.D. 2011) (principles on presenting arguments at oral argument)
  • Paulson v. Paulson, 2010 ND 100 (N.D. 2010) (remand directive to apply Ruff-Fischer guidelines)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Paulson v. Paulson
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 18, 2011
Citation: 801 N.W.2d 746
Docket Number: No. 20100399
Court Abbreviation: N.D.