History
  • No items yet
midpage
PAUL HASTINGS, LLP v. EGBERT PERRY
A21A1729
| Ga. Ct. App. | Dec 6, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Egbert Perry and Integral Development, LLC sued Paul Hastings, LLP and two attorneys for abusive litigation related to a prior lawsuit.
  • On March 3, 2020 the trial court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss; the court of appeals denied interlocutory review of that denial.
  • On February 26, 2021 the trial court granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.
  • The trial court granted two extensions to file a notice of appeal: one (authorized) extending the deadline to April 26, 2021, and a second (unauthorized) extending it to May 26, 2021.
  • Plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal on May 25, 2021; defendants moved to dismiss as untimely and filed a cross-appeal on June 4, 2021 from the earlier denial of their motion to dismiss.
  • The Court of Appeals held the plaintiffs’ notice was untimely under OCGA § 5-6-38/39 and therefore it lacked jurisdiction over both the plaintiffs’ appeal and the defendants’ cross-appeal; both appeals were dismissed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of plaintiffs' notice of appeal The second extension authorized filing by May 26, 2021, so the May 25 notice was timely Only one statutory extension is permitted; the second extension was unauthorized, so the notice was untimely Notice filed May 25 was untimely because only one extension was statutorily authorized; court lacks jurisdiction; appeal dismissed
Jurisdiction for defendants' cross-appeal (implicit) cross-appeal appropriate after plaintiffs filed notice Cross-appeal depends on existence of a timely principal appeal and the order sought to be appealed was interlocutory and not directly appealable No independent basis for cross-appeal jurisdiction; because plaintiffs’ appeal was untimely, cross-appeal dismissed

Key Cases Cited

  • Cody v. State, 277 Ga. 553 (Ga. 2004) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional requirement)
  • Legare v. State, 269 Ga. 468 (Ga. 1998) (OCGA § 5-6-39 permits only one extension for filing a notice of appeal)
  • Rockdale County v. Water Rights Committee, 189 Ga. App. 873 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989) (an unauthorized extension order is a nullity)
  • Jones v. Peach Trader, 302 Ga. 504 (Ga. 2017) (the right to appeal depends on statutory authority)
  • Seals v. State, 311 Ga. 739 (Ga. 2021) (courts may not rewrite statutes to create jurisdiction)
  • Clark v. Atlanta Independent School System, 311 Ga. App. 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011) (cross-appeal jurisdiction depends on availability of a principal appeal)
  • Forest City Gun Club v. Chatham County, 280 Ga. App. 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (lack of jurisdiction over principal appeal forecloses related cross-appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: PAUL HASTINGS, LLP v. EGBERT PERRY
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 6, 2021
Docket Number: A21A1729
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.