Paul E. Forshey v. Theodore A. Jackson, M.D.
33834
W. Va.Mar 22, 2024Background
- Paul E. Forshey underwent carpal tunnel surgery performed by Dr. Theodore Jackson in July 1995.
- Post-surgery, Forshey continued to experience pain and other symptoms in his hand, but Dr. Jackson did not order an x-ray despite follow-up visits.
- In 2005, an x-ray (prompted by an unrelated injury) revealed a piece of knife blade in Forshey’s hand, allegedly left during the 1995 surgery.
- Forshey and his wife filed a medical malpractice suit in August 2006, over 11 years after the initial surgery.
- The circuit court dismissed the action as untimely under West Virginia’s Medical Professional Liability Act’s statute of repose, which bars claims filed more than 10 years after the alleged injury.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether continuous medical treatment doctrine applies | The continuous medical treatment doctrine should be adopted and applied, making the claim timely (accrual at last treatment date, Jan. 31, 1997) | The claim is based on a discrete act (surgery), so accrual should be surgery date; thus, the statute of repose has expired | Doctrine adopted but does not apply; injury date is surgery date; action untimely |
| Whether continuing tort theory saves the claim | Each postoperative visit without x-ray was a separate tort, making the last omission the accrual date | No repetitious wrongful acts alleged; only continuation of original harm | Continuing tort requires repeated wrongful acts, not just lasting harm; complaint insufficient |
| Standard for considering exhibits on motion to dismiss | Exhibits attached to the complaint can be considered without treating as summary judgment | Agreed; circuit court properly considered attached certificate of merit | Affirmed: attached exhibits may be considered under Rule 12(b)(6) |
| Sufficiency of pleadings for new theories | Certificate of merit can support continuing tort allegations | Complaint must allege all material facts to support a theory | Certificate of merit can't create new causes not pled in complaint |
Key Cases Cited
- Gaither v. City Hosp., Inc., 199 W. Va. 706, 487 S.E.2d 901 (W. Va. 1997) (interpreting Medical Professional Liability Act’s statute of repose and two-year discovery rule)
- Albright v. White, 202 W. Va. 292, 503 S.E.2d 860 (W. Va. 1998) (de novo standard of review for motions to dismiss)
- Ricottilli v. Summersville Mem’l Hosp., 188 W. Va. 674, 425 S.E.2d 629 (W. Va. 1992) (continuing tort doctrine requires repetitious wrongful conduct)
- State ex rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc., 194 W. Va. 770, 461 S.E.2d 516 (W. Va. 1995) (de novo standard for appellate review of dismissals)
