History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patrick F. Dye, Jr. v. Jimmy Sexton
695 F. App'x 482
| 11th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Sexton removed the state-court complaint invoking diversity jurisdiction.
  • Dye is a Georgia citizen; Sexton is a Tennessee citizen; SportsTrust is an LLC with one member (Dye) per amended notice.
  • Plaintiffs moved to remand, arguing SportsTrust lacked proper citizenship data and existed only to defeat diversity.
  • Sexton amended removal to reflect SportsTrust as an LLC with Dye as the sole member, supported by state-record documents.
  • The district court remanded, finding Sexton failed to establish SportsTrust’s citizenship and that amended allegations were untimely.
  • This Court reverses, holds amendments under 28 U.S.C. § 1653 may cure defective removal allegations, and remands for leave to amend.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether remand was proper on procedural grounds Dye argues lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to citizenship defects. Sexton contends district court should consider amended removal. Remand on procedural defects proper; subject-matter jurisdiction remains with the district court’s review.
Whether § 1653 allows curing defective removal allegations Remand decision barred by untimely amendments; no cure available. Amendments should cure citizenship defects. Amendments may cure defective removal allegations; remedy available under § 1653.
Whether diversity exists after amended removal SportsTrust and Sexton are Tennessee citizens, defeating diversity. SportsTrust is an LLC with Dye as sole member, creating complete diversity with Sexton. Diversity exists; district court should consider amended removal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Corp. Mgmt. Advisors, Inc. v. Artjen Complexus, Inc., 561 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2009) (procedural defects in removal can be cured; jurisdictional defects may be amended)
  • Artjen Complexus, Inc. v. Corp. Mgmt. Advisors, Inc., 561 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2009) (remand for lack of citizenship is a procedural defect curable under § 1653)
  • Bethesda Mem’l Hosp., Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, 123 F.3d 1407 (11th Cir. 1997) (authority on remand timing and procedural defects assertion)
  • Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020 (11th Cir. 2004) (LLC citizenship for diversity: member citizenship matters)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Patrick F. Dye, Jr. v. Jimmy Sexton
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Jun 15, 2017
Citation: 695 F. App'x 482
Docket Number: 16-15457 Non-Argument Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.