240 A.3d 62
Me.2020Background
- Pat Doe filed for a protection-from-abuse order on behalf of his two minor children after their mother died; the District Court granted a temporary order that same day.
- Using the temporary order and Arizona assistance, Doe retrieved the children from Debora J. Batie in Arizona and returned them to Maine.
- At the hearing, Batie testified she took the children to Arizona based on the mother’s alleged consent, a power of attorney the mother executed, the mother’s will naming Batie guardian, and advice from an attorney.
- The District Court found Batie had removed the children while the mother was alive (and while the mother had a protection order against Doe), and after the mother’s death there was no order modifying parental rights under Maine law.
- The court concluded Batie knowingly restricted the children’s movement without the surviving parent’s consent and issued a protection-from-abuse order prohibiting Batie from contacting the children; Batie appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the protection-from-abuse statute applies when the defendant is the children’s grandmother (i.e., whether defendant and children are "family or household members") | Doe: the statute allows relief because abuse occurred against the minors and complaint was brought on their behalf | Batie: she was not a "family or household member" as defined by the statute | Court: No — statute limits protection orders to "family or household members," and record lacked findings/evidence that Batie and the children fit that definition, so order cannot stand |
| Whether Batie "knowingly" restricted the children’s movements without consent or lawful authority under 19‑A M.R.S. § 4002(1)(D) | Doe: Batie removed and kept the children in Arizona without consent or lawful authority, satisfying the statute | Batie: she reasonably believed she had authority based on the mother’s consent, power of attorney, will, and attorney advice; she did not know she lacked authority | Court: No — record lacks competent evidence that Batie acted with knowledge she lacked authority; she believed she had lawful authority until Doe enforced the temporary order in Arizona |
Key Cases Cited
- Dyer v. Dyer, 5 A.3d 1049 (Me. 2010) (standard of review: statutory interpretation de novo; factual findings for clear error)
- L’Heureux v. Michaud, 938 A.2d 801 (Me. 2007) (standard for reviewing protection-from-abuse findings)
- Clark v. McLane, 86 A.3d 655 (Me. 2014) (protection-from-abuse relief limited to acts between or by "family or household members")
- Croxford v. Roberts, 509 A.2d 662 (Me. 1986) (surviving parent’s parental rights automatically vest on death of other parent)
