midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
3 F. Supp. 3d 129
S.D.N.Y.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Paskar and FOLA sue City of New York and DSNY alleging NSMTS near LaGuardia creates aviation hazards and violates RCRA and related federal regs.
  • Plaintiffs contend NSMTS near Runway 31 would attract birds, increasing bird-strike risk.
  • Defendants move to dismiss: NSMTS is not an MSWLF regulated by 40 C.F.R. Part 258 and no private FAA action exists under 49 U.S.C. § 44718(a).
  • Court grants motion to dismiss due to lack of RCRA MSWLF jurisdiction and absence of private right of action under § 44718(a).
  • Prior related actions include FAA challenges and Article 78 proceedings, none successful; Fourth action seeks review of FAA-related determinations, now resolved against plaintiffs.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether NSMTS is a MSWLF under RCRA Paskar/FOLA contend NSMTS is a MSWLF and subject to 40 C.F.R. § 258.10. Defendants say transfer stations are not landfills and not federally regulated under Part 258. Not a MSWLF; transfer station is not a permanent disposal site.
Whether there is a private right of action under 49 U.S.C. § 44718(a) Plaintiffs imply a private right to enforce § 44718(a). No private right of action exists; remedy lies with the Secretary of Transportation. No private right of action; claim dismissed.
Whether FAA September 2, 2010 letter constitutes a final order subject to review City/FAA letter challenged as final agency action. Letter is not a final order; not reviewable. Letter not a final order; action moot.

Key Cases Cited

  • Montauk-Caribbean Airways, Inc. v. Hope, 784 F.2d 91 (2d Cir.1986) (no private right of action implied in FAA enforcement)
  • ATSI Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 493 F.3d 87 (2d Cir.2007) (pleading standard for plausibility under Twombly/Iqbal)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (U.S. 2009) (plausibility standard for complaint adequacy)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (U.S. 2007) (plausibility standard for pleading)
  • Paskar v. United States Dep’t of Transp., 714 F.3d 90 (2d Cir.2013) (FAA-related review of NSMTS, panel held recommendations not binding)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Paskar v. City of New York
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Mar 10, 2014
Citations: 3 F. Supp. 3d 129; 78 ERC (BNA) 1731; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32135; 2014 WL 956288; No. 13 Civ. 5897 (PAC)
Docket Number: No. 13 Civ. 5897 (PAC)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In