Partlow v. State
2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 78
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Partlow, age 16 at the time of the crimes, was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery with a deadly weapon.
- Trial court sentenced him to life without parole for murder and 45 years for robbery, consecutive.
- Partlow challenged suppression of statements and physical evidence, arguing lack of reasonable suspicion for a detention.
- Witnesses described a white Chevy Malibu with bondo matching a BOLO; police detained occupants after sighting near the crime scene.
- Trial court denied suppression; on appeal, court affirmed the stop and Partlow’s convictions but vacated the murder sentence for resentencing.
- Miller v. Alabama (2012) prompted reconsideration of mandatory life without parole for juveniles; the court remanded for resentencing and discussed options.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the stop/detention was supported by reasonable suspicion | Partlow | Partlow | The stop was reasonable; suppression denied. |
| Whether mandatory life without parole for a juvenile violates the Eighth Amendment | Partlow | State | Remand for resentencing required under Miller; life-with-parole-25 revival discussed. |
| What sentencing options are available post-Miller | Partlow | State | Remand and consideration of revival of life-with-parole-25; issue certified for further guidance. |
Key Cases Cited
- Hunter v. State, 660 So.2d 244 (Fla. 1995) (defines 'founded suspicion' and factors for BOLO-based detentions)
- State v. Setzler, 667 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1995) (construes Fourth Amendment per US Supreme Court guidance)
- Coney v. State, 341 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (reasonable investigatory stop with BOLO proximity and descriptions)
- Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012) (invalidated mandatory life without parole for juveniles)
- Washington v. State, 103 So.3d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (discussed post-Miller sentencing options and remand)
- B.H. v. State, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1994) (statutory revival doctrine and immediate predecessor limits)
