Panezich v. Green
2016 Ohio 7948
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016Background
- Petitioner Clifton J. Panezich was indicted by a Mahoning County grand jury on 22 counts alleging a scheme selling counterfeit sports/entertainment memorabilia; several counts were first- and second-degree felonies.
- Panezich, a Nevada resident at the time of indictment, requested bond and the trial court held bond hearings.
- The trial court set bond at $500,000 after the initial hearing and again after a second hearing.
- Panezich filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court arguing the bond was excessive and seeking expedited relief.
- The State moved to dismiss the habeas petition on procedural grounds.
- The court dismissed the petition because Panezich failed to file the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) describing prior civil actions, a mandatory statutory requirement for inmate-filed civil actions.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether bond of $500,000 is excessive and subject to habeas relief | Panezich argued the bail was excessive and sought habeas relief to reverse/set aside bond | State defended the bond and moved to dismiss the petition on procedural grounds | Court did not reach the merits; habeas petition dismissed for noncompliance with statutory filing requirements |
| Whether failure to file the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) mandates dismissal of an inmate's civil action (including habeas) | Panezich did not file the required affidavit and offered no timely cure | State argued mandatory statutory compliance required dismissal | Court held R.C. 2969.25 is mandatory; failure to comply requires dismissal of the habeas petition |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Hall v. Mohr, 17 N.E.3d 581 (Ohio 2014) (statutory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory; failure to comply requires dismissal)
- Fuqua v. Williams, 797 N.E.2d 982 (Ohio 2003) (habeas corpus is a civil action subject to R.C. 2969.21–2969.27)
