History
  • No items yet
midpage
326 Ga. App. 163
Ga. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Hinson, a Gwinnett County family-law attorney, consulted with Pampattiwar on July 2, 2010 to represent him in a divorce; Pampattiwar said he had a pending separate maintenance action in Fulton County but that no divorce counterclaim had been filed. Hinson checked the Fulton County online docket, which did not show a divorce counterclaim, and then filed a divorce petition in Gwinnett County.
  • Opposing counsel later informed Hinson that a divorce counterclaim in the Fulton County case had been filed nearly a year earlier; Hinson obtained a deposition showing Pampattiwar knew of the counterclaim at the time of the consultation.
  • The Gwinnett petition was voluntarily dismissed; Hinson continued representing Pampattiwar in Fulton for a time but later withdrew.
  • Hinson discovered two allegedly defamatory internet reviews on Kudzu.com (usernames STAREA and REALPOLICE); an IT expert linked the IP address used to post the reviews to Pampattiwar. Hinson sued for fraud (misrepresentation re: counterclaim), libel per se, and false light invasion of privacy, seeking "wounded feelings" damages under OCGA § 51-12-6.
  • A jury found for Hinson on fraud, libel per se, and false light claims. Pampattiwar moved for JNOV and new trial; the trial court denied those motions. Pampattiwar appealed; the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Hinson) Defendant's Argument (Pampattiwar) Held
Whether jury verdict on fraud should stand given alleged lack of justifiable reliance Hinson argued she reasonably relied on Pampattiwar's statement and the online Fulton docket showing no counterclaim Pampattiwar argued Hinson should have examined the Fulton County documents he brought and thus reliance was unjustified Court: Reliance was a jury question; denying JNOV was proper because evidence supported reasonable reliance
Whether "wounded feelings" damages under OCGA § 51-12-6 constitute "actual damages" for fraud Hinson contended her entire injury was to peace, happiness, and feelings and such damages are recoverable actual damages for fraud Pampattiwar argued those damages are not "actual damages" for fraud Court: "Wounded feelings" are recoverable as actual/general damages for fraud; new trial denied
Whether Hinson could recover OCGA § 51-12-6 damages on libel given failure to request retraction (impact on punitive/deterrence aspect) Hinson argued current § 51-12-6 no longer authorizes punitive-deterrence considerations, so wounded-feelings damages are available Pampattiwar argued § 51-12-6 awards are partly punitive and unavailable because no retraction request was made Court: After 1987 amendments, § 51-12-6 no longer permits punitive/deterrent awards; damages were permissible and trial court did not err (defendant forfeited any charge objections)
Whether false-light claim failed because second Kudzu review was not publicly posted Hinson argued both reviews were posted and traceable to Pampattiwar's IP; jury could find publicity Pampattiwar argued the REALPOLICE review was flagged/rejected and never posted, so no publicity Court: Factual dispute existed; Kudzu business records and testimony supported posting; publicity element was for jury; new trial denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Wellons, Inc. v. Langboard, Inc., 315 Ga. App. 183 (court will affirm denial of new trial or JNOV if any evidence supports verdict)
  • Wright v. Apartment Investment & Mgmt. Co., 315 Ga. App. 587 (question is whether a contrary judgment was demanded)
  • Elliott v. Marshall, 179 Ga. 639 (diligence and whether falsity could have been ascertained is ordinarily for the jury)
  • Isbell v. Credit Nation Lending Svc., 319 Ga. App. 19 (failure to pursue available means of knowledge can preclude fraud recovery as a matter of law)
  • Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, 253 Ga. App. 639 (justifiable reliance generally a jury question)
  • Kelley v. Cooper, 325 Ga. App. 145 (actual damages for fraud may include nonpecuniary "wounded feelings")
  • Zieve v. Hairston, 266 Ga. App. 753 (injury to reputation is personal injury; general damages recoverable in fraud action)
  • Holland v. Caviness, 292 Ga. 332 (1987 amendment to OCGA § 51-12-6 removed deterrence/punitive considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pampattiwar v. Hinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 12, 2014
Citations: 326 Ga. App. 163; 756 S.E.2d 246; 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 615; 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 132; 2014 WL 943230; A13A2432
Docket Number: A13A2432
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    Pampattiwar v. Hinson, 326 Ga. App. 163