Palmer v. State
485, 2016
| Del. | Jul 7, 2017Background
- Police received tips in Oct–Nov 2015 that 311 W. 29th St. in Wilmington was a "stash house" for weapons; one tip came from a confidential informant described as "past proven and reliable."
- Surveillance showed frequent short-term visitor activity consistent with a stash house; officers also knew defendant Isaiah Palmer lived at that address and was prohibited from possessing firearms because of prior convictions.
- Police obtained a magistrate-issued search warrant for firearms at the residence, executed it on November 12, 2015, and found a .45 handgun on a box in the basement bedroom, ammunition in a shed, and quantities of heroin in the house and outside bins.
- Palmer was indicted on drug and weapons charges; a motion to suppress the search results was denied; trials produced convictions for Aggravated Possession and Possession of a Firearm During Commission of a Felony (jury), and Possession of a Firearm/Ammunition by a Person Prohibited (bench).
- On appeal Palmer argued (1) the warrant affidavit lacked probable cause (insufficient informant corroboration) and (2) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on joint possession and failing to give a curative instruction after a jury question.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probable cause for warrant | State: affidavit (two informants, surveillance, officers' knowledge of Palmer) gave magistrate enough for probable cause | Palmer: informant info insufficiently corroborated; affidavit lacked detail on informants' basis of knowledge; anonymous shooting call irrelevant | Affirmed — totality of circumstances (reliable CI, corroborative surveillance, officers' knowledge) supported magistrate's finding of probable cause |
| Jury instruction on joint possession (and curative instruction) | State: instruction appropriate where others had access to room where drugs found; jury must still find possession beyond reasonable doubt | Palmer: no evidence of joint enterprise or shared possession; jury question implied unsupported assumption; requested curative instruction not given | Affirmed — joint-possession instruction supported by evidence of other persons' access; curative-instruction claim waived for failure to raise at trial or in opening brief |
Key Cases Cited
- Rivera v. State, 7 A.3d 961 (Del. 2010) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
- Fink v. State, 817 A.2d 781 (Del. 2003) (search-warrant issuance requires probable cause)
- Sisson v. State, 903 A.2d 288 (Del. 2006) (affidavit must show reasonable belief evidence will be found in place searched)
- McKinney v. State, 107 A.3d 1045 (Del. 2014) (deference to magistrate’s probable-cause determination)
- Smith v. State, 887 A.2d 470 (Del. 2005) (totality-of-circumstances test for informant tips)
- Robertson v. State, 41 A.3d 406 (Del. 2012) (standard of review for jury instructions)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause)
