History
  • No items yet
midpage
Palmer v. State
485, 2016
| Del. | Jul 7, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Police received tips in Oct–Nov 2015 that 311 W. 29th St. in Wilmington was a "stash house" for weapons; one tip came from a confidential informant described as "past proven and reliable."
  • Surveillance showed frequent short-term visitor activity consistent with a stash house; officers also knew defendant Isaiah Palmer lived at that address and was prohibited from possessing firearms because of prior convictions.
  • Police obtained a magistrate-issued search warrant for firearms at the residence, executed it on November 12, 2015, and found a .45 handgun on a box in the basement bedroom, ammunition in a shed, and quantities of heroin in the house and outside bins.
  • Palmer was indicted on drug and weapons charges; a motion to suppress the search results was denied; trials produced convictions for Aggravated Possession and Possession of a Firearm During Commission of a Felony (jury), and Possession of a Firearm/Ammunition by a Person Prohibited (bench).
  • On appeal Palmer argued (1) the warrant affidavit lacked probable cause (insufficient informant corroboration) and (2) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on joint possession and failing to give a curative instruction after a jury question.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause for warrant State: affidavit (two informants, surveillance, officers' knowledge of Palmer) gave magistrate enough for probable cause Palmer: informant info insufficiently corroborated; affidavit lacked detail on informants' basis of knowledge; anonymous shooting call irrelevant Affirmed — totality of circumstances (reliable CI, corroborative surveillance, officers' knowledge) supported magistrate's finding of probable cause
Jury instruction on joint possession (and curative instruction) State: instruction appropriate where others had access to room where drugs found; jury must still find possession beyond reasonable doubt Palmer: no evidence of joint enterprise or shared possession; jury question implied unsupported assumption; requested curative instruction not given Affirmed — joint-possession instruction supported by evidence of other persons' access; curative-instruction claim waived for failure to raise at trial or in opening brief

Key Cases Cited

  • Rivera v. State, 7 A.3d 961 (Del. 2010) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
  • Fink v. State, 817 A.2d 781 (Del. 2003) (search-warrant issuance requires probable cause)
  • Sisson v. State, 903 A.2d 288 (Del. 2006) (affidavit must show reasonable belief evidence will be found in place searched)
  • McKinney v. State, 107 A.3d 1045 (Del. 2014) (deference to magistrate’s probable-cause determination)
  • Smith v. State, 887 A.2d 470 (Del. 2005) (totality-of-circumstances test for informant tips)
  • Robertson v. State, 41 A.3d 406 (Del. 2012) (standard of review for jury instructions)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Palmer v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Jul 7, 2017
Docket Number: 485, 2016
Court Abbreviation: Del.