History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 3388
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • PAG Holdings sued Michael and Denitra Love for damages to PAG’s rental property under a January 2008 lease; security deposit was $2,340.00.
  • Loves provided a repair list; PAG repaired some items; Loves moved out in June 2010; PAG kept the security deposit alleging damages beyond normal wear and tear.
  • PAG filed a municipal court action on October 28, 2010 seeking $6,603.32; Loves defaulted; PAG obtained a default judgment on December 28, 2010.
  • A magistrate heard damages; the magistrate found Loves liable for $452.74 for repairs, kept the deposit, and denied any award because no counterclaim.
  • On December 23, 2011, the trial court partially sustained PAG’s objections, awarded $2,130.18 in damages, but because the deposit was $2,340, no further amount was owed; PAG appealed.
  • The appellate court overruled PAG’s assignments of error and affirmed the trial court’s judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Proper measure of damages for temporary property injury PAG: must prove reasonable cost of restoration with consideration of pre-damage condition Loves: not required to prove diminution in value to recover restoration costs No reversible error; PAG must show reasonable restoration cost and pre-damage condition
Weight of the evidence supporting the damages award PAG: damages supported by evidence; court erred in not awarding full demonstrated costs Loves: testimony credible; Court could disallow windfall given pre-lease condition Not against the manifest weight; credibility and evidence support the court’s decision

Key Cases Cited

  • Martin v. Constr. Servs., Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 66 (Ohio 2009) (reasonable cost of restoration; consider pre-damage condition; diminution in value may be offered as factor)
  • Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational Church of Toledo, 126 Ohio St. 140 (Ohio 1933) (damages based on reasonable restoration costs; consider pre-damage condition)
  • C.E. Morris Co. v. Foley Const. Co., 54 Ohio St.2d 279 (Ohio 1978) (manifest weight standard; substantial evidence required)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: PAG Holdings v. Love
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 27, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 3388; 12CA0012
Docket Number: 12CA0012
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    PAG Holdings v. Love, 2012 Ohio 3388