P.S. VS. BOARD OF REVIEW(BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)
A-0734-15T1
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.Jun 7, 2017Background
- P.S. resigned from her account executive position at NBC40/Access 1 on August 19, 2013, after alleging sexual harassment by the station’s general manager, Ron Smith, and other workplace disputes.
- She applied for unemployment benefits; the Deputy Director determined she was disqualified because she voluntarily quit without good cause attributable to work.
- At the Appeal Tribunal telephonic hearing, the Tribunal found she left without good cause, noting Smith had been terminated over three months before her resignation; the Tribunal denied benefits in a decision mailed December 9, 2013. P.S. did not appeal within 20 days, so the decision became final.
- During discovery in P.S.’s separate civil suit, company witnesses and a termination letter indicated Smith was fired for violating the sexual harassment policy; P.S. contended this contradicted Access 1’s hearing testimony.
- On March 23, 2015, P.S. filed a late appeal to the Board of Review asserting newly discovered evidence justified extending the appeal period; the Board dismissed the appeal as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), finding no good cause to excuse the delay.
- The Appellate Division affirmed, concluding the newly disclosed reason for Smith’s termination did not excuse the 13-month delay because Smith’s departure well before P.S.’s resignation undermined any claim that his presence caused her to quit; P.S.’s own testimony showed she knew Smith was fired for sexual harassment prior to the Tribunal hearing.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Board erred in dismissing P.S.’s appeal as untimely under the 20‑day statute | P.S.: discovery revealed new evidence (company testimony and a termination letter) showing Smith was fired for sexually harassing her, constituting good cause to file late | Board/Access 1: statutory deadline applies; P.S. failed to show circumstances outside her control or unforeseeable delay | Held: No error—Board reasonably found no good cause to excuse 13‑month delay; affirmed |
| Whether newly obtained evidence about the reason for Smith’s termination entitles P.S. to reconsideration | P.S.: Access 1 misrepresented the reason for Smith’s termination at the Tribunal; that misrepresentation affected benefits determination | Respondents: Smith’s termination occurred months before resignation, so the reason for termination is irrelevant to her decision to quit | Held: Evidence immaterial to timeliness or merits because Smith’s prior departure meant she had no work‑related cause to quit |
| Whether due process required admission of late appeal due to alleged perjured testimony | P.S.: relying on fairness, she should not be prejudiced by respondents’ alleged false testimony | Respondents: procedural deadline and lack of prejudice; no extraordinary due process basis | Held: No due process violation; exceptions to deadline not triggered here |
| Whether appellate review should overturn Board as arbitrary/capricious | P.S.: Board’s dismissal was arbitrary given new evidence | Respondents: Board’s decision supported by record and precedent giving deference to agency findings | Held: Agency decision afforded deference and was supported by record; not arbitrary or capricious |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182 (overview of limited appellate review of agency decisions)
- Henry v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571 (standards for judicial review of administrative actions)
- Thurber v. City of Burlington, 387 N.J. Super. 279 (agency decisions entitled to presumption of reasonableness)
- Matter of Vey, 272 N.J. Super. 199 (deference to administrative factfinding)
- Campbell v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 39 N.J. 556 (standard for reversing administrative findings)
- In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19 (judicial review limitations of agency determinations)
- Rivera v. Bd. of Review, 127 N.J. 578 (good‑cause exceptions to statutory appeal deadlines where due process requires)
- Garzon v. Bd. of Review, 370 N.J. Super. 1 (Board regulations and flexibility to excuse late appeals in limited circumstances)
