Owners Association of the Bella Vista Villas, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Company
1:16-cv-01018
D. Colo.Dec 7, 2017Background
- Plaintiff (Owners Association of the Bella Vista Villas) sued Defendant (Owners Insurance) for breach of contract and bad-faith/unreasonable delay under Colorado law after wind/hail damage to insured property.
- The policy contains an appraisal clause allowing each party to select an appraiser, the appraisers to select an umpire, and a judge to select an umpire only if the appraisers cannot agree.
- Parties entered an Appraisal Agreement and the case was administratively closed to permit appraisal; earlier disputes over appraiser impartiality led to a prior motion to disqualify denied by the magistrate judge.
- Appraisers (one for each side) agreed on and signed a Selection of Umpire naming Nick Lovato, but Plaintiff later sought to withdraw from that agreement and asked the Court to remove/replace the umpire.
- The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to re-open and to appoint a different umpire, concluding (1) the parties’ contracts do not clearly authorize the Court to intervene at this stage and (2) the Appraisal Agreement does not provide a basis to remove an already-selected umpire.
- The Court required that the case remain administratively closed and ordered that it will only be re-opened after (a) the appraisal process concludes (or is abandoned) and (b) the parties certify they participated in good-faith mediation with a commercial insurance mediator.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Court authority to intervene in appraisal process | Court may appoint/remove umpire because appraisal clause contemplates judicial selection when appraisers cannot agree | Court intervention appropriate to resolve disputes delaying appraisal | Court: Parties’ private contracts do not grant automatic court authority to police every appraisal dispute; Plaintiff identified no legal basis for relief at this stage (motion denied) |
| Right to withdraw from agreed-upon umpire and obtain judicial appointment | Plaintiff sought to withdraw from written Selection of Umpire and have judge appoint replacement | Selection was executed by appraisers; clause for judge selection applies only if appraisers cannot agree | Court: Appraisers had agreed in writing; Appraisal Agreement contains no procedure to remove a sitting umpire and only permits vacating an award as a potential consequence of objections — not removal now (motion denied) |
Key Cases Cited
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Summit Park Townhome Ass'n, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (D. Colo. 2015) (discussing appraisal purpose and contract construing appraisal clauses)
- Heideman v. Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2003) (economic loss generally does not constitute irreparable harm for preliminary injunction)
