Opinion of the Justices
69 So. 3d 847
Ala.2011Background
- Governor requested an advisory opinion under Ala. Code 12-2-10 on SB 373, which provides withholding incentives to 'approved entities'.
- SB 373 authorizes an approved entity to retain a percentage of state income taxes withheld from eligible employees for up to 20 years with a qualifying project.
- Definitions and structure: ADO Director, Commissioner of Revenue, Governor endorse an approved entity; State Industrial Development Authority makes the final written approval; qualifying project agreements govern incentives.
- Statutory framework: §211.01 vests authority to levy income tax; §211.02 requires net proceeds to be used first for homestead-related revenue replacement and then for the Alabama Special Education Trust Fund for teachers’ salaries.
- Question presented: whether SB 373 violates §§ 211.01, 211.02, or 212 of the Alabama Constitution.
- Court’s conclusion: addressed only §211.02; SB 373 violates §211.02; declined to rule on §§ 211.01 and 212.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does SB 373 violate § 211.01? | Brown argues SB 373 conflicts with §211.01's tax power restrictions. | SB 373 is within legislative discretion to promote economic development. | Declined to answer |
| Does SB 373 violate § 211.02? | SB 373 diverts net income tax proceeds from designated uses under §211.02. | SB 373 does not divert; withheld taxes may be allocated as incentives. | SB 373 violates §211.02 |
| Does SB 373 violate § 212? | SB 373 implicates constitutional debt or pledge restraints under §212. | SB 373 does not create unauthorized debt pledges. | Declined to answer |
Key Cases Cited
- Opinion of the Justices No. 346, 665 So.2d 1357 (Ala. 1995) (funds constitutionally earmarked; cannot divert net income tax proceeds)
- Opinion of the Justices No. 351, 665 So.2d 1389 (Ala. 1995) (revenue sources and constitutional restrictions on use of tax proceeds)
- State v. Manley, 441 So.2d 864 (Ala. 1983) (constitutional limits on legislature's appropriation power)
