Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.
2:19-cv-01041-EAS-EPD
S.D. OhioMay 29, 2019Background
- Two related federal cases: Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop (17-CV-783) filed Sept. 5, 2017, and Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop (19-CV-1041) filed Mar. 20, 2019; both seek declaratory relief, CERCLA cost recovery, and common-law damages for environmental contamination at warehouse properties.
- The court formally related the cases on April 17, 2019.
- Both plaintiffs moved to consolidate the actions for all purposes; the Kuusakoski defendants opposed full consolidation but did not oppose consolidation for fact discovery.
- Defendants argued that factual differences between facilities, differing cleanup histories, and differing defendant relationships could prejudice expert discovery, dispositive motions, and trial fairness and allocation of CERCLA liability.
- The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Sixth Circuit precedent regarding consolidation discretion and the objectives of expedition and economy.
- Ruling: cases consolidated only for fact discovery; motions to consolidate beyond fact discovery (expert discovery, dispositive motions, trial) denied without prejudice pending completion of fact discovery.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether to consolidate the two related CERCLA cases for all purposes | Consolidation promotes efficiency and economy because cases raise common questions of law and fact | Full consolidation is premature and prejudicial due to significant factual differences among facilities, differing defendant relationships, and potential allocation issues under CERCLA; OK to consolidate for fact discovery only | Court granted consolidation limited to fact discovery; denied further consolidation (expert discovery, dispositive motions, trial) without prejudice pending fact discovery |
Key Cases Cited
- Cantrell v. GAF Corp., 999 F.2d 1007 (6th Cir. 1993) (district courts have broad discretion to consolidate cases)
- Advey v. Celotex Corp., 962 F.2d 1177 (6th Cir. 1992) (consolidation aims to administer court business with expedition and economy)
