History
  • No items yet
midpage
823 N.W.2d 798
Wis.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Weigel appealed a referee's report recommending 30 months' suspension for professional misconduct; OLR cross-appealed for license revocation.
  • The court found referee's findings of fact supported and resolved that revocation of Weigel's license was warranted, with full costs ($24,309.84) assessed against him and responsibility for any trust-deficit shortfall.
  • Weigel's practice dissolved with Alvin Eisenberg; after a 1999 buyout, the firm continued to suffer substantial trust account deficits and recordkeeping failures.
  • Historical trust-account problems began in the 1990s under Eisenberg, including forgery losses; after 1999, the firm repeatedly failed to maintain proper ledgers, deposits, disbursements, and reconciliations.
  • The complaint charged ten counts, including willful failure to deliver funds to third parties and improper trust-account handling under SCR 20:1.15 and SCR 20:8.4.
  • Final orders revoke Weigel's Wisconsin license effective February 1, 2013, and require freezing/opening of a new trust account, restitution of shortfalls, and costs within set timeframes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the referee's fact findings are clearly supported OLR argues findings are supported; misconduct established Weigel contends some facts are explained by corrective efforts Yes; findings are supported and upheld
Whether revocation is the proper sanction OLR seeks revocation to protect public Weigel argues 30-month suspension suffices Revocation is appropriate and proportionate
Whether costs and restitution should be awarded OLR seeks full costs, possible restitution for deficits Weigel objects to cost amount as excessive Costs ordered; deficits to be reimbursed as directed
Whether post-hearing orders regarding trust accounts are proper OLR supports freezing/opening new trust account and remedying deficits Weigel challenges scope of post-hearing remedies Post-hearing financial remedies imposed to address remaining deficits

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 71 (Wis. 2004) (trust-account rule context and supervisory standards)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Widule, 2003 WI 34 (Wis. 2003) (scope of review in attorney discipline; de novo on law)
  • In re Trust Estate of Martin, 159 N.W.2d 660 (Wis. 1968) (trustee accounting principles applied to attorneys; detailed records required)
  • Matter of Miles, 516 S.E.2d 661 (S.C. 1999) (discipline: detailed records required to overcome allegations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Weigel
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 2012
Citations: 823 N.W.2d 798; 2012 Wisc. LEXIS 794; 345 Wis. 2d 7; 2012 WI 124; No. 2011AP659-D
Docket Number: No. 2011AP659-D
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
Log In
    Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Weigel, 823 N.W.2d 798