History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boyle
813 N.W.2d 215
Wis.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Boyle appeal of referee's recommendation for discipline (60-day suspension, costs, and $5,000 restitution to Fund).
  • Referee found 11 counts of misconduct across three clients and cooperation with OLR investigations.
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted the referee's findings and imposed the 60-day suspension, costs, and Fund restitution.
  • Boyle has prior disciplinary history (2008 private reprimand) and practices in Milwaukee since 1995.
  • Counts include lack of diligence, poor communication, improper handling of fees, failure to protect client interests, and dishonesty during OLR investigations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is a 60-day suspension appropriate? Boyle argues for reprimand or license restriction. OLR supports 60-day suspension as appropriate. Yes, 60-day suspension warranted.
Is restitution to the Fund appropriate? Boyle challenges restitution to the Fund. OLR supports restitution of $5,000 plus interest. Yes, restitution of $5,000 plus interest required.
Should the full costs be imposed? Boyle does not dispute costs. OLR seeks full costs based on misconduct. Yes, full costs imposed.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747 (WI 2004) (adopts referee findings; supports discipline framework)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Widule, 261 Wis. 2d 45, 660 N.W.2d 686 (WI 2003) (discretion on discipline; uses referee reasoning)
  • In re Bridget Boyle-Saxton, 668 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2012) (Seventh Circuit disbarment for abandonment of client)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boyle
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: May 23, 2012
Citation: 813 N.W.2d 215
Docket Number: No. 2010AP2566-D
Court Abbreviation: Wis.