History
  • No items yet
midpage
793 N.W.2d 494
Wis.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Kostich, Wisconsin lawyer since 1970, Milwaukee practitioner, had prior public reprimands in 1986 and 2005.
  • OLR filed a complaint on February 4, 2009 alleging a conflict of interest in Kostich's representation of Giannini in a criminal case.
  • G.K., age 13 in 1965, was a victim of Sister Norma Giannini; GK discussed a potential civil action with Kostich and provided confidential information.
  • Kostich later represented Giannini in a criminal proceeding arising from the same alleged sexual assaults; GK objected when learning of the representation.
  • GK had disclosed confidential information and therapy records to Kostich; no written consent from GK for the later representation was obtained.
  • Referee found a clear conflict of interest and that Kostich acted contrary to SCR 20:1.9(a); the supreme court imposed a public reprimand plus ethics CLE and ordered costs.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Kostich violate SCR 20:1.9(a)? OLR argues former client GK, adverse interests, no written consent; conflict prohibited. Kostich contends no representation of GK and no conflict; no written agreement or file created. Yes; represented Giannini after GK's consultation, violating SCR 20:1.9(a).
Was GK a former client and the matter substantially related? GK's confidential information and therapy records showed a substantial relation to Giannini case. No formal attorney-client relationship established; no file or retainer. GK was a former client and the representation of Giannini was substantially related.
What is the appropriate sanction? Public reprimand plus additional ethics CLE and costs reflect egregious conflict. Varying discipline arguments appear; not addressed beyond costs and reprimand. Public reprimand plus ten ethics CLE credits within 12 months and payment of costs; potential suspension for noncompliance.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kostich, 282 Wis.2d 206 (2005 WI) (SCR 20:1.9(a) conflict after former representation; consent required)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kostich, 700 N.W.2d 763 (2005) (same disclipinary context; detailed findings)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kostich, 132 Wis.2d 227 (1986 WI) (earlier reprimand for unrelated misconduct)
  • Kalal, 252 Wis.2d 261 (2002 WI) (standards for reviewing referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kostich
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 21, 2010
Citations: 793 N.W.2d 494; 2010 WI 136; 2010 Wisc. LEXIS 586; 330 Wis. 2d 378; No. 2009AP287-D
Docket Number: No. 2009AP287-D
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
Log In
    Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kostich, 793 N.W.2d 494