History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bridget E. Boyle
840 N.W.2d 694
Wis.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Attorney Boyle engaged in disciplinary proceedings for misconduct spanning Counts Four through Thirteen; the referee found nine counts proven and recommended a four‑month suspension, restitution of $2,500 to a client, and full costs.
  • She had prior discipline: a 2008 private reprimand and a 2012 60‑day suspension, with subsequent international history of disciplinary actions including disbarment in the Seventh Circuit.
  • The Supreme Court reviewed the referee's factual findings de novo with respect to conclusions of law and sanctions, affirming most findings but imposing a longer suspension.
  • The Court ordered a six‑month suspension, full costs, and restitution of $2,500 to B.T. (C.P.’s companion who paid the fee), with reinstatement conditions.
  • The public policy aim was protection of the public and the bar by ensuring substantial steps toward ethical reform before resuming practice.
  • Full costs of the proceeding and restitution to the client were imposed as conditions of discipline.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether six‑month suspension is appropriate OLR/often the four‑month term; Boyle’s excuses inadequate Boyle argues lesser sanction sufficient given history Six‑month suspension upheld
Restitution to C.P.’s companion for $2,500 fee Refund required for unearned or misapplied funds Argues about earned fees; credibility concerns with justification Restitution of $2,500 ordered to B.T.
Disposition of full costs Costs should be borne by Boyle as misconduct Discretionary; argued differently Full costs imposed on Boyle

Key Cases Cited

  • Hankel v. State Bar, 126 Wis.2d 390 (Wis. 1985) (discipline proportional to misconduct; public protection)
  • Joset, 309 Wis.2d 5 (Wis. 2008) (six‑month suspension for multiple failures to communicate and duties)
  • In re Inglimo, 305 Wis.2d 71 (Wis. 2007) (de novo review of misconduct; standard applicable)
  • Glynn, 238 Wis.2d 860 (Wis. 2000) (discipline for diligence, communication, and cooperation failures)
  • Widule, 261 Wis.2d 45 (Wis. 2003) (discretionary sanctions authority in disciplinary matters)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bridget E. Boyle
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 26, 2013
Citation: 840 N.W.2d 694
Docket Number: 2011AP001767-D
Court Abbreviation: Wis.