History
  • No items yet
midpage
463 P.3d 85
Utah Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Patrick J. O'Connor suffered a workplace injury on May 3, 1983; in March 1987 the Labor Commission ordered Employers' Reinsurance Fund (ERF) to pay him permanent total disability benefits of $241 per week.
  • Historically Utah law set statutory minimum weekly benefits for permanently and totally disabled workers; prior increases included express retroactivity clauses.
  • In 1988 the legislature replaced fixed minimums with a formula: after 312 weeks the minimum equals 36% of the current state average weekly wage (no retroactivity clause).
  • By July 2008 the formula-based minimum exceeded O'Connor's $241 weekly payment. O'Connor petitioned the Commission to increase his award to 36% of the then-current average weekly wage.
  • An ALJ granted O'Connor summary judgment; the Commission reversed, concluding the 1988 amendment was not retroactive and the law at the time of injury controlled. O'Connor sought judicial review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the 1988 amendment (36% of current AWW minimum) applies to benefits for a 1983 injury O'Connor: the relevant event is when his payments fell below the statutory minimum (2008); amendment is procedural/should apply ERF: entitlement arises at time of injury (1983); the controlling law is the statute in effect at injury; 1988 amendment is not retroactive Court: Law at time of injury governs; 1988 amendment not retroactive; Commission's decision affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Clark, 251 P.3d 829 (Utah 2011) (clarifies that applicability depends on the event regulated—apply law in effect at time of event)
  • Brown & Root Industrial Servs. v. Industrial Comm'n of Utah, 947 P.2d 671 (Utah 1997) (amendment affecting workers' compensation benefits that altered substantive rights did not apply retroactively)
  • Marshall v. Industrial Comm'n, 704 P.2d 581 (Utah 1985) (interest on overdue benefits can apply retroactively because interest is incident to an existing right)
  • Utah State Road Comm'n v. Industrial Comm'n, 168 P.2d 319 (Utah 1946) (the law governing compensation is that in effect when the injury occurred)
  • Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 416 P.3d 583 (Utah 2017) (applies principle that compensation law is that which existed at time of injury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: O Connor v. Labor Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Mar 26, 2020
Citations: 463 P.3d 85; 2020 UT App 49; 20190145-CA
Docket Number: 20190145-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In
    O Connor v. Labor Commission, 463 P.3d 85