History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nunnally v. State
311 Ga. App. 558
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Nunnally, age 16 at arrest, was arrested on Oct 2, 2009 for aggravated assault, armed robbery with a firearm, and firearms during a felony; superior court had jurisdiction over the matter.
  • Nunnally turned 17 on Dec 28, 2009 and was transferred to the county jail.
  • Indictment for the charges was returned on May 4, 2010, 214 days after detention.
  • On Jul 6, 2010, Nunnally moved to quash the indictment and transfer to juvenile court for failure to indict within 180 days under OCGA 17-7-50.1.
  • State sought a retroactive extension of time to file the indictment, and the trial court granted an out-of-time extension on Oct 20, 2010, more than a year after detention.
  • The trial court denied Nunnally’s motion and implicitly granted the extension; the case proceeded in the trial court and this interlocutory appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 180-day deadline and transfer are mandatory under OCGA 17-7-50.1. Nunnally contends the 180-day period was not met and the case must be transferred. State argues an after-the-fact extension can render timely indictment. Indictment void; mandatory transfer to juvenile court.
Whether the extension statute can authorize a retroactive extension after the deadline. Nunnally argues extensions cannot cure untimely indictments. State contends an extension granted after the period may be valid. Extension granted after deadline cannot cure untimely indictment; grand jury loses authority.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hill v. State, 309 Ga.App. 531, 710 S.E.2d 667 (2011) (indictment outside 180 days requires transfer to juvenile court; applies mandatory transfer)
  • State v. Henderson, 263 Ga.508, 436 S.E.2d 209 (1993) (‘shall’ is mandatory; jurisdictional timelines terminate actions)
  • Haugen v. Henry County, 277 Ga. 743, 594 S.E.2d 324 (2004) (statutory terms are to be read as plain and mandatory)
  • Hollowell v. Jove, 247 Ga. 678, 279 S.E.2d 430 (1981) (plain construction governs where terms are unambiguous)
  • Smith v. State, 192 Ga.App. 604, 386 S.E.2d 370 (1989) (demonstrates automatic discharge upon certain terminations)
  • Sikes v. Charlton County, 103 Ga.App. 251, 119 S.E.2d 59 (1961) (nunc pro tunc limitations; cannot cure non-action)
  • Brown v. Kroger Co., 278 Ga. 65, 597 S.E.2d 382 (2004) (automatic dismissal rules; loss of jurisdiction if not timely)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nunnally v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 1, 2011
Citation: 311 Ga. App. 558
Docket Number: A11A1159
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.