midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
443 B.R. 808
8th Cir. BAP
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor and wife formed Lanadar Corp. in 1985 to operate a home improvement business and transferred gold coins to Lanadar in 2005.
  • In 2005 American Distributors, a Missouri corporation, was formed; Debtor personally guaranteed its loan from Bank.
  • Debtor and wife filed two personal financial statements listing gold, silver, platinum coins and mutual funds, with ownership indeterminate.
  • Bank renewed the 2006 loan in 2008; Debtor again guaranteed, with similar financial statements omitting clear ownership of assets.
  • In 2009, Debtor released a second mortgage in exchange for a CD; American Distributors was liquidated, leaving a Bank claim of about $170,484.20, and Debtor filed for Chapter 7.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Material falsity of statements Bank argues statements misrepresent ownership and liens on coins and funds. Lindsey contends statements portrayed assets under de facto control and disclosed liabilities. Not clearly erroneous that statements were not materially false.
Materiality standard under 523(a)(2)(B) Bank contends omissions/ownership issues would affect credit decision. Court found assets were controllable and still available to pay debts. Bank failed to prove material misrepresentation; no clear error.
Reasonable reliance Bank relied on statements for credit extensions. Bank evidence showed other factors; may not have relied on statements. Court did not require finding Bank relied on statements; and any reliance finding not clearly erroneous.
Intent to deceive Debtor knew ownership issues and LIEN statuses; intended to deceive. Debtor disclosed assets and cooperated; no deceptive intent found. No clear error; record supports lack of requisite intent.

Key Cases Cited

  • Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (1991) (preponderance standard for nondischargeability elements)
  • Pontow, 111 F.3d 604 (8th Cir. 1997) (reliance reviewed for totality of circumstances)
  • In re Freier, 604 F.3d 583 (8th Cir. 2010) (clear error review for 523(a)(2)(B) elements)
  • In re Simpson, 29 B.R. 202 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1983) (circumstantial evidence of intent to deceive standard)
  • In re Van Horne, 823 F.2d 1285 (8th Cir. 1987) (intent evaluation in 523(a)(2)(A)/(B) contexts)
  • Cutcliff v. Reuter, 427 B.R. 727 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2010) (tenancy by entirety ownership implications in reliance)
  • Blodgett v. Comm'r, 394 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir. 2005) (credibility determination afforded deference)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Northland National Bank v. Lindsey (In Re Lindsey)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 8, 2011
Citations: 443 B.R. 808; 2011 WL 383735; BAP 10-6045
Docket Number: BAP 10-6045
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir. BAP
Log In