Northlake Development L.L.C. v. Bankplus
2011 Miss. LEXIS 234
| Miss. | 2011Background
- Earwood secretly formed Northlake Development, LLC, with himself as sole owner and signed Kinwood’s warranty deed to convey Kinwood’s property to Northlake.
- Northlake obtained BankPlus loan secured by a deed of trust on Kinwood’s property; most loan proceeds were used by Earwood for his own use.
- Kinwood’s majority member Kiniyalocts objected in Northlake’s bankruptcy proceedings, arguing Earwood lacked authority and the Kinwood deed was void.
- A bankruptcy court found Earwood had no authority to convey Kinwood’s property and that Kinwood deed could not pass title; judgment voided the deeds and cancelled them in land records.
- The Fifth Circuit certified the Mississippi Supreme Court to resolve whether an unauthorized conveyance is voidable or void ab initio and whether ratification could later bind Kinwood.
- The Mississippi Supreme Court held Earwood had no actual or apparent authority; the conveyance was void ab initio and not voidable, and Kinwood did not ratify the act.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether unauthorized conveyance is voidable or void ab initio | Kinwood: lack of authority makes deed void ab initio | BankPlus: deed should be voidable and enforceable deed of trust | Void ab initio; no ratification occurred |
Key Cases Cited
- Kinwood Capital Group v. BankPlus (In re Northlake Dev., L.L.C.), 614 F.3d 140 (5th Cir.2010) (certified Mississippi issue on authority in LLC transfers)
- Christian Methodist Episcopal Church v. S & S Constr. Co., 615 So.2d 568 (Miss. 1993) (agency and authority principles in Mississippi)
- Estate of Cappaert, 991 So.2d 1209 (Miss.2008) (ratification can be shown by affirmative acts or inaction)
- Patriot Commercial Leasing Co. v. Jerry Enis Motors, Inc., 928 So.2d 856 (Miss.2006) (act of agent beyond authority binds principal to extent of authority)
- Mladineo v. Schmidt, 52 So.3d 1154 (Miss.2010) (apparent authority exists when reasonably inferred from duties)
