History
  • No items yet
midpage
312 F.R.D. 111
S.D.N.Y.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • NJMG sued Fox News for copyright infringement over a 9/11 photograph posted on Fox-associated Facebook pages; two related actions were consolidated for trial.
  • Fox News counterclaimed against NJMG for copyright infringement and Lanham Act false endorsement based on NJMG’s posting of three short Fox-owned video clips on NJMG’s website.
  • NJMG filed a third-party indemnification claim against News Distribution Network, Inc. (NDN) and the Daily Caller, asserting contractual indemnity for the video-hosting arrangement.
  • Third Party Defendants (NDN and Daily Caller), joined by NJMG, moved under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 to sever the Video Counterclaims and Indemnification Claims from the Photo Claims; discovery on the Photo Claims was essentially complete while discovery on the counterclaims had not begun.
  • The court evaluated the Rule 21 severance factors (same transaction, common questions, witness/document overlap, judicial economy/settlement, prejudice) and found the video/indemnity claims factually distinct and minimally overlapping with the photo claims.
  • Court granted severance: Video Counterclaims and Indemnification Claims were severed from the Photo Claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Video Counterclaims and Indemnification Claims should be tried with the Photo Claims or severed under Rule 21 NJMG (joining Third Party Defs.) argued severance warranted because the counterclaims/indemnity claims arise from different facts, involve different parties, and discovery for them had not occurred Fox News argued claims are related as all involve alleged unauthorized uses of copyrighted media and share legal issues under the Copyright Act, so a single trial promotes efficiency Severance granted: claims are factually distinct with minimal overlap; judicial efficiencies insufficient to overcome prejudice and readiness disparities
Whether the claims arise from same transaction or occurrence NJMG: different works, different media, different incidents; not the same transaction Fox: all claims involve one media company allegedly using another's copyrighted content without permission; legal framework common Court: not same transaction—isolated incidents require separate analyses; favors severance
Whether there are common questions of law or fact sufficient to deny severance NJMG: legal overlap (copyright law) is insufficient because factual bases differ Fox: common legal issues (fair use, commerciality) and some overlapping factual questions about NJMG’s site management Court: legal issues overlap but factual predicates differ materially; favors severance
Whether severance would prejudice parties or hurt judicial economy NJMG/Third Party Defs.: joinder would prejudice third parties forced into expedited discovery and trial; severance may facilitate settlement and fairness Fox: severance causes inefficiency, duplicate trials, and extra expense for Fox; cautionary jury instructions can mitigate prejudice Court: concerns of prejudice to Third Party Defs. and trial-readiness disparity outweigh marginal efficiencies; favors severance

Key Cases Cited

  • Oram v. SoulCycle LLC, 979 F. Supp. 2d 498 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (discussing Rule 21 severance standards and factors)
  • Agnesini v. Doctor's Assoc., Inc., 275 F.R.D. 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (severance burden and relatedness of claims)
  • Cia. Embotelladora del Pacifico v. Pepsi Cola Co., 256 F.R.D. 131 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (joinder strongly encouraged; courts have discretion to sever)
  • United Mine Workers of Am. v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966) (proximity of claims and joinder principles)
  • Costello v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 888 F. Supp. 2d 258 (D. Conn. 2012) (claims under same statute may be severable where facts differ)
  • Ricciuti v. New York City Transit Auth., 796 F. Supp. 84 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (convenience and prejudice justify severance)
  • Spencer, White & Prentis, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., 498 F.2d 358 (2d Cir. 1974) (counterclaims based on different factual situations may be severable)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Nov 20, 2015
Citations: 312 F.R.D. 111; 2015 WL 7313875; 14 Civ. 7630 (ER)
Docket Number: 14 Civ. 7630 (ER)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In
    North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC, 312 F.R.D. 111