Norman v. State
298 Ga. 344
| Ga. | 2016Background
- Victim Monique Flores-Owens was found dead in a hotel room registered to Edward Norman; cause of death was manual strangulation.
- Norman gave an hour-long recorded statement admitting he killed Flores-Owens, stayed with the body for about two days, and engaged in sexual acts with the corpse. He also said he covered her with a sheet and placed two Bibles on her body before leaving.
- Hotel guests testified they heard a struggle, saw Norman and a naked woman when they knocked, and observed Norman slam the door and act aggressively—corroborating parts of his confession.
- Physical and medical evidence (condition of room, time body remained, injuries consistent with manual strangulation) matched Norman’s account.
- Norman was convicted of malice murder and necrophilia; he challenged the sufficiency of evidence for necrophilia and portions of the prosecutor’s closing argument. He did not testify; trial court denied his motions and he appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of necrophilia evidence | State: confession plus corroborating facts supported conviction | Norman: confession was the only evidence and was uncorroborated and equivocal | Affirmed — confession was corroborated by independent facts; jury could convict beyond reasonable doubt |
| Reliability/clarity of necrophilia confession | State: defendant repeatedly and spontaneously admitted postmortem sexual acts | Norman: statements were vague, elusive, contradictory | Affirmed — confession was direct ("Yes" when asked) and repeated; sufficient when viewed with corroboration |
| Use of uncorroborated confession under Georgia law | State: confession may be used if corroborated in any particular | Norman: relied solely on confession which must not be the only evidence | Affirmed — Georgia law requires corroboration in any particular; present here |
| Prosecutor's closing argument | State: closing was proper | Norman: prosecutor made improper remarks | Not reviewed — defendant failed to object at trial, waiving review on appeal |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
- Moore v. State, 285 Ga. 157 (2009) (confession need only be corroborated in any particular)
- Merritt v. State, 292 Ga. 327 (2013) (confession may be considered with other facts not wholly independent of it)
- Vega v. State, 285 Ga. 32 (2009) (jury decides witness credibility and resolves conflicts)
- Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259 (2014) (same standard applies to directed-verdict/directed-acquittal review)
- Scott v. State, 290 Ga. 883 (2012) (failure to object to closing argument waives appellate review)
