History
  • No items yet
midpage
415 P.3d 348
Idaho
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Adjacent properties were originally one parcel; the Shaffers sold a fenced pasture to the Murdocks, and the fence was treated by subsequent owners as the boundary between the two parcels.
  • Over decades the fence was removed and replaced on the ground by lilac bushes, maintained lawns, a shed, a driveway, and a carport that consistently marked the apparent boundary across successive owners (Shaffers, Murdocks, Whiteheads, Larsens, Talbots, Cromwells, Heaps, Parkers).
  • The Parkers sold the “Nielson Property” by warranty deed to Glen and Cheryl Nielson; the deed’s legal description, however, differed from the long‑respected on‑the‑ground boundary.
  • After purchase the Nielsons measured the deeded legal description and discovered the Talbots’ carport and shed encroached onto their deeded land by ~13 feet; they then removed the lilacs and sued the Talbots (quiet title/injunction) and the Parkers (breach of warranty/duty to defend title).
  • The district court granted summary judgment for the Talbots and Parkers, quieting title in the Talbots based on an oral agreed boundary evidenced by monuments on the ground; the Nielsons appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether district court erred granting summary judgment to Talbots on property line Nielson: deed legal description controls; on‑the‑ground features (carport/shed) were not sufficient notice of an altered boundary Talbot: predecessors orally agreed to the boundary; monuments (lilacs, shed, carport, lawns) provided notice to successors Affirmed: oral agreed boundary controls where successors had notice via monuments on the ground; summary judgment for Talbots proper
Whether district court erred dismissing Nielsons’ breach of warranty claim against Parkers Nielson: Parkers warranted the deeded description and thus owe damages/attorney fees for lost property Parkers: the deed was effectively altered by the longstanding agreed boundary so breach claim fails Vacated/remanded: breach claim may survive; Nielsons may recover damages/fees for property lost despite quiet title for neighbor; remand to determine liability and damages
Whether district court erred by denying motion to disqualify counsel for Talbots and Parkers Nielson: counsel adverse because Parkers may owe duty to defend against warranty claim Talbots/Parkers: representation appropriate; no demonstrated abuse of discretion Affirmed: district court did not abuse discretion in denying disqualification
Whether any party entitled to attorney fees on appeal Talbots/Parkers: request fees under I.C. § 12‑121 Nielson: opposed Denied: no fee award — appeal was not frivolous; Nielsons prevailed on warranty issue; Talbots not entitled to fees on appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • Campbell v. Weisbrod, 73 Idaho 82, 245 P.2d 1052 (disagreed oral boundary marked on ground controls over deed description)
  • Paurley v. Harris, 75 Idaho 112, 268 P.2d 351 (successor purchasers put on notice by visible boundary markers)
  • Reid v. Duzet, 140 Idaho 389, 94 P.3d 694 (oral agreed boundaries bind successors with notice; monuments can provide notice)
  • Flynn v. Allison, 97 Idaho 618, 549 P.2d 1065 (quiet title for adverse possessor does not preclude seller's warranty liability for lost land and defense costs)
  • Griffel v. Reynolds, 136 Idaho 397, 34 P.3d 1080 (damages for lost property require quieted and defined new boundary before measurement)
  • Elliott v. Thompson, 63 Idaho 395, 120 P.2d 1014 (warranty breach may recover litigation/defense expenses and cost of extinguishing adverse title)
  • Kosanke v. Kopp, 74 Idaho 302, 261 P.2d 815 (judgment affecting real property must describe lands with certainty)
  • Stafford v. Weaver, 136 Idaho 223, 31 P.3d 245 (once boundary agreed, parties absorb increases/decreases in deeded acreage)
  • Teton Peaks Inv. Co. v. Ohme, 146 Idaho 394, 195 P.3d 1207 (discussing limits on recovery once agreed boundary established)
  • Flying Elk Inv., LLC v. Cornwall, 149 Idaho 9, 232 P.3d 330 (same)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nielson v. Talbot
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 4, 2018
Citations: 415 P.3d 348; 163 Idaho 480; Docket 44864
Docket Number: Docket 44864
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
Log In
    Nielson v. Talbot, 415 P.3d 348