midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
473 B.R. 755
8th Cir. BAP
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Nielsen and spouse filed joint Chapter 7 on Oct 7, 2009; ECMC intervened in the § 523(a)(8) adversary; trial held Nov 2, 2011; bankruptcy court ruled in Nielsen's favor regarding dischargeability? actually against discharge; record on appeal incomplete; facts drawn from bankruptcy court order and Nielsen’s narrative; Nielsen had student loans totaling $48,361 with prior education in electronics; family income around $30,000/year plus SNAP, WIC, bonuses, and large annual tax refunds; ICRP potential for repayment was a central consideration; court applied totality-of-circumstances standard to determine undue hardship.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Nielsen proved undue hardship under § 523(a)(8) Nielsen seeks discharge under totality. ECMC contends no undue hardship. No undue hardship; discharge denied; court affirmed.
Role of ICRP in evaluating repayment ability ICRP could render repayment feasible; favorable factor. ICRP may reduce payments but not dispositive; potential tax issues not controlling. ICRP is an important factor but does not automatically discharge the debt.
Effect of record incompleteness on appellate review Record on appeal incomplete; errors cannot be fully assessed. Record deficiencies do not derail de novo review. Court conducted de novo review using available record and affirmed.
Impact of living expenses and mold-related claims on undue hardship Mold exposure and costs should be considered as necessary expenses. Record insufficient to support ongoing mold-related costs; expenses not shown as necessary. Record insufficient to show mold-related costs and ongoing treatment; no undue hardship based on these factors.

Key Cases Cited

  • Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Jesperson, 571 F.3d 775 (8th Cir. 2009) (totality-of-the-circumstances test for undue hardship)
  • Tenn. Student Assist. Corp. v. Hood, 541 U.S. 440 (U.S. 2004) (Self-executing nature of § 523(a)(8); not dischargeable unless undue hardship shown)
  • In re Long, 322 F.3d 549 (8th Cir. 2003) (guides under totality of circumstances)
  • In re Walker, 650 F.3d 1227 (8th Cir. 2011) (deference to factual findings; factor in totality review)
  • In re Cumberworth, 347 B.R. 652 (8th Cir. BAP 2006) (context for hardship analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nielsen v. Acs, Inc. (In re Nielsen)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 9, 2012
Citations: 473 B.R. 755; 2012 WL 2726771; BAP No. 12-6020
Docket Number: BAP No. 12-6020
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir. BAP
Log In
    Nielsen v. Acs, Inc. (In re Nielsen), 473 B.R. 755