History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nicholas v. Lake Cty.
2013 Ohio 4294
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Norma Nicholas was injured stepping off a sidewalk at the Lake County Juvenile Court grounds due to a drop-off/washout area obscured by tall grass.
  • County supervisor Klco testified the washout area was foreseeable and that stone repair was made as normal maintenance after the fall.
  • Nicholases filed a negligence action against Lake County Juvenile Court and Lake County for injuries and loss of consortium (later naming Lake County only in the appeal).
  • Lake County moved for summary judgment claiming governmental immunity under R.C. Chapter 2744; the trial court denied it.
  • On appeal, Lake County contends the judgment denying immunity is final, among other points; the court analyzes immunity under the three-tier framework.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the denial of statutory tort immunity is final and appealable Nicholas Lake County Final and appealable as to statutory immunity
Whether courthouse grounds maintenance falls within governmental functions Nicholas argues maintenance is within governmental function Lake County Grounds maintenance is a governmental function under 2744.01(C)(2)(g)
Whether the 2744.02(B)(4) 'physical defect' exception removes immunity Nicholas demonstrates a physical defect caused by neglect (hole/edge) Lake County argues no physical defect and the area as routine maintenance Material defect shown; immunity removed under 2744.02(B)(4)
Whether the 2744.03 defenses apply (A)(3) or (A)(5) Immunity not available due to lack of discretionary actions Discretionary planning/policy or judgment in using resources may shield liability Immunity not applicable under (A)(3) or (A)(5); maintenance not discretionary

Key Cases Cited

  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (Ohio 1996) (moving party bears initial Civ.R.56 burden; nonmoving must show genuine issue)
  • Mitseff v. Wheeler, 38 Ohio St.3d 112 (Ohio 1988) (summary judgment burden framework)
  • Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. of Texas, 59 Ohio St.3d 108 (Ohio 1991) (syllabus limitations on summary judgment burden)
  • Hall v. Fort Frye Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 111 Ohio App.3d 690 (Ohio App. 4th Dist. 1996) (physical defect concept under 2744.02(B)(4))
  • Johnson v. Ashtabula Cty. Joint Vocational School, 2010-Ohio-3054 (Ohio App. Dist. 11th) (routine maintenance not immunized under 2744.03(A)(5))
  • Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Cleveland, 2013-Ohio-270 (Ohio 8th Dist.) (discretionary actions; wanton or reckless standard under 2744.03(A)(5))
  • Elston v. Howland Local Schools, 2007-Ohio-2070 (Ohio 12) (three-tier immunity framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nicholas v. Lake Cty.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 30, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 4294
Docket Number: 2012-L-140
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.