History
  • No items yet
midpage
287 So.3d 322
Miss. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • June 27, 2017: James Smith parked his pickup (doors closed but unlocked; windows down) at a Gulfport Subway; later observed Nicholas Fontenot inside the passenger side without permission.
  • Smith confronted Fontenot; Smith and employee Tina Lewis (then Sears) observed the glove box open and the interior "in shambles."
  • Fontenot fled, was later stopped in another pickup after being flagged down by its driver; Smith and Lewis identified him by a distinctive scar.
  • Lewis testified her grandmother’s blue-stoned ring had been kept in the glove box and was missing after the incident; the ring was never recovered.
  • Fontenot was indicted for automobile burglary, convicted by a jury, and sentenced to seven years; he appealed the denial of his JNOV/new-trial motion arguing insufficient evidence and that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Fontenot) Defendant's Argument (State) Held
Whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support burglary (breaking and intent) No breaking because truck was unlocked/windows down (could be mere trespass); no proof of intent to steal—no stolen goods found on Fontenot. Eyewitness ID, glove box and cab shown rummaged, missing ring, and photos of the truck; jury could infer a breaking and intent to steal. Affirmed: Evidence sufficient; jury reasonably could find both breaking and intent.
Whether the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence (new trial) Missing ring never recovered; no photos/video/fingerprints; another similar ring existed—weight favors acquittal. Credible eyewitness testimony and physical condition of cab supported verdict; credibility/weight were for the jury. Affirmed: Denial of new trial not an abuse of discretion; verdict not manifestly unjust.

Key Cases Cited

  • Naylor v. State, 248 So. 3d 793 (Miss. 2018) (defines "breaking" for automobile burglary and affirms jury's role in resolving competing entry theories)
  • McClain v. State, 625 So. 2d 774 (Miss. 1993) (standard that reversal for insufficiency is warranted only when reasonable jurors could only find not guilty)
  • Lindsey v. State, 212 So. 3d 44 (Miss. 2017) (new-trial relief for weight-of-evidence claims is reserved for exceptional cases where verdict would sanction unconscionable injustice)
  • Parker v. State, 30 So. 3d 1222 (Miss. 2010) (JNOV challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting a guilty verdict)
  • Hall v. State, 760 So. 2d 817 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) (intent to burglarize distinguishes burglary from trespass)
  • Harper v. State, 478 So. 2d 1017 (Miss. 1985) (trespass is a lesser-included offense of burglary)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nicholas Paul Fontenot a/k/a Nicholas Fontenot a/k/a Nicholas Paul Fortenot v. State of Mississippi
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Dec 3, 2019
Citations: 287 So.3d 322; NO. 2018-KA-01489-COA
Docket Number: NO. 2018-KA-01489-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In