History
  • No items yet
midpage
427 S.W.3d 688
Ark. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Newsom and Roberts enter an Arkansas joint venture to farm about 5,100 acres; Newsom provides labor/equipment/expertise, Roberts provides capital; Rabo refinances Roberts’ existing lines but allegedly unaware of Newsom’s involvement; Newsom unpaid crop-related expenses while Roberts seeks financing; July 2010 Rabo loan approved with language about second or best lien; Newsom files suit seeking equitable lien and priority dispute over crop proceeds; circuit court holds Rabo lien valid and superior, Newsom equitable lien lesser, and Roberts’ lender-liability claim defeated by waiver/ release.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Lien priority between Rabo and Newsom Newsom argues Rabo’s lien is not superior to equitable lien Rabo asserts its UCC lien is valid and senior Rabo’s lien is valid and superior; Newsom’s equitable lien subordinated.
Roberts’s lender-liability claim and release Roberts contends release was duress/unconscionable/unsupported by consideration Rabo argues release was negotiated, voluntary, supported by consideration Summary judgment upheld; release valid and bars lender-liability claim.

Key Cases Cited

  • First Nat’l Bank of Lewisville v. Bank of Bradley, 96 S.W.3d 773 (Ark. 2003) (description of collateral sufficiency under UCC 4-9-108/B)
  • Simmons First Bank of Ark. v. Bob Callahan Servs., Inc., 13 S.W.3d 570 (Ark. 2000) (priority of liens; equitable considerations on appeal)
  • Cox v. McLaughlin, 867 S.W.2d 460 (Ark. 1993) (duress standard for contract formation)
  • Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., 584 P.2d 15 (Alaska 1978) (duress/real-world context of releases in limited cases)
  • Sims v. First Nat’l Bank, 590 S.W.2d 270 (Ark. 1979) (duress and unconscionability standards)
  • Litten v. Jonathan Logan, Inc., 286 A.2d 913 (Pa. Super. 1972) (release validity context in contract disputes)
  • Adkinson v. Kilgore, 970 S.W.2d 327 (Ark. App. 1998) (equitable lien principles and unjust enrichment constraints)
  • Feagin v. Jackson, 419 S.W.3d 29 (Ark. App. 2012) (appellate standard for equitable relief)
  • Bank of Lewisville v. Bank of Bradley, N/A (N/A) (relevance of collateral description in UCC filing (cited as supporting authority))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Newsom v. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Apr 17, 2013
Citations: 427 S.W.3d 688; 80 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 628; 2013 WL 1682379; 2013 Ark. App. 259; 2013 Ark. App. LEXIS 265; No. CA 12-634
Docket Number: No. CA 12-634
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
Log In
    Newsom v. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc., 427 S.W.3d 688