History
  • No items yet
midpage
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Ernst & Young LLP
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7680
| 9th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Broadcom engaged in a large stock option backdating scheme causing a $2.2B restatement for 1998–2005.
  • EY audited Broadcom and issued a 2005 unqualified opinion covering 2003–2005.
  • Plaintiffs allege EY knew or was reckless about backdating and still issued clean opinions.
  • Key alleged red flags include a May 2000 grant with no documentation and other irregular grants.
  • Complaint asserts EY’s knowledge/recklessness caused misstatements in Broadcom’s financials and their restatement.
  • EY’s alleged involvement in 2003 corrective reforms is cited as evidence of awareness.
  • District court dismissed for lack of scienter; Ninth Circuit reverses and remands for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether EY's alleged scienter is sufficiently pled EY knew or recklessly ignored backdating indicators Auditors lack sufficient information and context; no strong inference of fraud Yes, strong inference supported
May 2000 backdated grant as a red flag May 2000 grant with no documentation signals intent to misstate Possibility of innocent explanation or insufficient evidence Yes, supports scienter
Undermanned compensation committee and subsequent approvals Grants dated while quorum absent show improper oversight Documentation and processes could be misinterpreted; not conclusive Yes, supports scienter
EY's role in 2003 corrective reforms EY participated in reforms but did not reveal prior misstatements Reforms reflect compliance with SOX; not indicative of fraud Yes, supports scienter when viewed with broader context

Key Cases Cited

  • Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) (plaintiff must show a strong inference of scienter)
  • In re Countrywide Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., 588 F.Supp.2d 1132 (C.D. Cal. 2008) (red flags/GAAS line of inquiry; auditor scienter standards)
  • In re Software Toolworks Inc. Sec. Litig., 50 F.3d 615 (9th Cir. 1994) (helpful standard for assessing scienter, especially auditor cases)
  • In re Homestore.com, Inc. Sec. Litig., 252 F.Supp.2d 1018 (C.D. Cal. 2003) (logical inference of scienter from audit failures)
  • In re Daou Sys., Inc., 411 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2005) (GAAP/GAAS violations and scienter inference)
  • In re Oxford Health Plans Inc. Sec. Litig., 51 F.Supp.2d 290 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (holistic scienter evaluation recognizing in-your-face facts)
  • Public Employees' Ret. Ass'n of Colo. v. Deloitte & Touche, 551 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2009) (limited reliance on missing documentation; context-specific)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: New Mexico State Investment Council v. Ernst & Young LLP
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 14, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7680
Docket Number: 09-55632
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.