History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nesson v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District
204 Cal. App. 4th 65
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Nesson, a radiologist, and the Hospital entered a radiology department service agreement in 2007 for a term that was terminable on 30 days’ notice and extended monthly.
  • Nesson was contractually obligated to maintain active medical staff membership with privileges and to oversee radiology operations and personnel.
  • In February 2009, the Medical Executive Committee (MEC) gave Nesson a summary suspension for substandard and dangerous patient care and volatile behavior, with a plan for evaluations.
  • Following the suspension, the Hospital terminated the Agreement on February 19, 2009, finding it impossible for Nesson to comply while suspended.
  • Nesson sought reappointment and later filed suit seeking damages for breach of contract, retaliation, and discrimination, among other claims.
  • The Hospital moved to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute; the trial court granted the motion, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether anti-SLAPP applies to peer-review actions. Nesson argues the claims arise from breach of contract and are not protected by peer-review activity. Hospital asserts claims arise from protected peer-review proceedings and should be struck absent probability of success. Yes; the actions arise from protected peer-review proceedings and are subject to anti-SLAPP analysis.
Whether exhaustion of remedies bars the suit. Nesson did not exhaust internal remedies before filing suit. Westlake requires exhaustion before seeking court relief, which was not done here. Yes; failure to exhaust administrative/judicial remedies bars the claims.
Whether the termination of the Agreement was inextricably intertwined with the MEC’s suspension. Claims target only the contract termination, not the suspension. Termination was based on the suspension and is inseparable from the peer-review action. Yes; termination inseparably tied to suspension, constituting protected activity.
Whether Nesson can prevail on contract or other claims given the suspension and inability to practice. Possible to claim damages notwithstanding suspension; contract could be breached independently. Suspension precluded performance; no damages under contract; no independent tort duty. No; contractual performance was excused due to suspension; no prevailing claims.
Whether FEHA, Unruh, and related claims survive given the PE or disability findings. Discrimination and disability claims based on perceived impairment. No evidence of actual disability or failure to accommodate; tied to peer-review actions. No; claims fail as they rely on the protected peer-review actions.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital Dist., 39 Cal.4th 192 (Cal. 2006) (hospital peer review proceedings are official proceedings protected by anti-SLAPP)
  • Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.3d 465 (Cal. 1976) (exhaustion of remedies before suing for damages in peer-review context)
  • Ellison v. Sequoia Health Services, 183 Cal.App.4th 1486 (Cal. App. 2010) (governing body may exercise independent judgment in peer review with weight to findings)
  • Medical Staff of Sharp Memorial Hospital v. Superior Court, 121 Cal.App.4th 173 (Cal. App. 2004) (public safety priority; due process rights subordinate in peer review)
  • Lee v. Blue Shield of California, 154 Cal.App.4th 1369 (Cal. App. 2007) (exhaustion requirement and mandamus avenues in peer-review context)
  • Eight Unnamed Physicians v. Medical Executive Committee, 150 Cal.App.4th 503 (Cal. App. 2007) (exhaustion and administrative remedies in hospital peer review)
  • Navellier v. Sletten, 29 Cal.4th 82 (Cal. 2002) (two-prong anti-SLAPP test and required showing of probability of prevailing)
  • City of Cotati v. Cashman, 29 Cal.4th 69 (Cal. 2002) (central anti-SLAPP framework and focus on gravamen of action)
  • Flatley v. Mauro, 39 Cal.4th 299 (Cal. 2006) (two-step anti-SLAPP analysis and broad construction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nesson v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 10, 2012
Citation: 204 Cal. App. 4th 65
Docket Number: No. E053414
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.