Nelsenn Simon v. State
162 So. 3d 216
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2015Background
- Defendant Nelsenn Simon was convicted of second-degree murder and appealed, arguing the manslaughter jury instruction was fundamentally erroneous because it repeated the intent element of the greater offense.
- At trial evidence included a witness who heard the victim tell Simon “Whenever you saw me, you would fight with me,” after which Simon stabbed the victim with a broken bottle; another witness testified Simon had said days earlier he planned to kill the victim.
- The Fourth District initially affirmed Simon’s conviction relying on Singh v. State, which upheld a standard manslaughter instruction under similar circumstances.
- While Simon’s petition was pending, the Florida Supreme Court decided Haygood v. State, which effectively overruled Singh by holding that a culpable-negligence manslaughter instruction cannot cure an erroneous manslaughter-by-act instruction when the evidence does not support culpable negligence.
- The Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction, quashed the Fourth District’s prior opinion, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Haygood.
- On remand the Fourth District concluded the evidence did not reasonably support manslaughter by culpable negligence and held the manslaughter-by-act instruction was fundamental error, reversing and remanding for a new trial on second-degree murder.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the manslaughter instruction was fundamentally erroneous because it included the same intent element as the greater offense | State argued the standard instruction was proper and Singh controlled | Simon argued the instruction improperly duplicated intent and was fundamentally erroneous | Court held the instruction was fundamental error under Haygood and reversed for new trial |
| Whether a culpable-negligence manslaughter instruction cures an erroneous manslaughter-by-act instruction | State argued alternative culpable-negligence instruction could cure error | Simon argued evidence did not support culpable negligence so cure was unavailable | Court held cure was unavailable because evidence did not support culpable negligence |
Key Cases Cited
- Haygood v. State, 109 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 2013) (holding a culpable-negligence manslaughter instruction cannot cure an erroneous manslaughter-by-act instruction when evidence does not support culpable negligence)
- Singh v. State, 36 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (previous Fourth District decision upholding a standard manslaughter instruction; effectively overruled by Haygood)
- Simon v. State, 38 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (initial Fourth District opinion affirming conviction, later quashed and remanded by the Florida Supreme Court)
