History
  • No items yet
midpage
NECA-IBEW Rockford Local Union 364 Health & Welfare Fund v. a & a Drug Co.
736 F.3d 1054
7th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • NECA-IBEW Health and Welfare Fund challenged Sav-Rx’s invoicing under a Local Agreement without arbitration.
  • National Agreement offered better pricing/services and contains a mandatory arbitration clause; locals could opt in.
  • Fund trustees never voted on adopting the National Agreement; Sav-Rx began applying National terms anyway.
  • Fund accepted (and benefited from) National-Agreement pricing and audits for eight years without repudiation.
  • District court held the Fund bound to the National Agreement by ratification; Fund appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Fund had actual authority to bind itself to the National Agreement Fund lacked a vote/authorization for the National Agreement Sav-Rx relied on implied or ratified authority Not bound by actual authority
Whether Eschen had implied authority to bind the Fund to the National Agreement Eschen’s actions bound the Fund; chair's authority extends to major contracts Implied authority does not extend to extraordinary contracts Not bound by implied authority
Whether Sav-Rx could bind the Fund through apparent authority Trustees impliedly held Eschen out as authorized No evidence trustees held Eschen out as having such authority Not bound by apparent authority
Whether the Fund ratified the National Agreement by accepting its benefits Acceptance of benefits does not equal ratification without knowledge Knowledge of benefits imputable to Fund; benefits accepted constitute ratification Yes; the Fund ratified the National Agreement by accepting its benefits and not repudiating them

Key Cases Cited

  • Fyrnetics Ltd. v. Quantum Group, Inc., 293 F.3d 1023 (7th Cir. 2002) (unsigned-contract binding by conduct; agency principles apply)
  • Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Taylor Mach. Works, Inc., 125 F.3d 468 (7th Cir. 1997) (implied authority limits for binding contracts)
  • Wasleff v. Dever, 550 N.E.2d 1132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990) (implied authority considerations in agency)
  • Opp v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., 231 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir. 2000) (agency knowledge imputation and authority)
  • Sphere Drake Ins. Ltd. v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 376 F.3d 664 (7th Cir. 2004) (ratification and knowledge in agency context)
  • George F. Mueller & Sons, Inc. v. Northern Ill. Gas Co., 299 N.E.2d 601 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973) (agency knowledge and ratification principles)
  • Nat'l Prod. Workers Union Ins. Trust v. Cigna Corp., 665 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2011) (knowledge imputation to corporate principal)
  • United States v. One Parcel of Land, 965 F.2d 311 (7th Cir. 1992) (knowledge of employees imputed to principal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: NECA-IBEW Rockford Local Union 364 Health & Welfare Fund v. a & a Drug Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Nov 25, 2013
Citation: 736 F.3d 1054
Docket Number: 12-3070
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.