History
  • No items yet
midpage
3 N.W.3d 151
N.D.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Fendee Group, LLC and associated entities (Fendee) developed a housing subdivision in Williston, North Dakota, with covenants permitting the homeowners association (HOA) to impose assessments and liens for unpaid fees.
  • Carinne Gould purchased a home in the subdivision in 2019, obtaining a mortgage from Guaranteed Rate, Inc., which was recorded on September 5, 2019, and assigned to the North Dakota Industrial Commission/Housing Finance Agency (NDHFA) on September 6, 2019.
  • Fendee's first assessment to Gould was made August 31, 2019, but payment was not due until September 10, 2019, after the mortgage recording.
  • Gould defaulted on the mortgage, and after her death in January 2023, Fendee filed liens in 2021 and 2023 for unpaid assessments, fines, fees, and legal expenses.
  • The district court granted summary judgment for NDHFA, finding its mortgage was superior to Fendee’s liens and denied Fendee’s claims for attorney’s fees.
  • Fendee appealed, arguing its HOA declarations created a “super lien” superior to all later-recorded mortgages or liens.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Superiority of liens (super lien) NDHFA: Its mortgage, recorded first, is superior Fendee: HOA covenants create a super lien with priority NDHFA's lien is superior; no super lien
Constructive/actual notice of lien NDHFA: Lien arose after mortgage recorded Fendee: NDHFA had notice via recorded covenants NDHFA's priority not affected by notice
Attorney's fees under declaration NDHFA: Not entitled as Fendee did not prevail Fendee: Declaration entitles prevailing party to fees Fendee not entitled to fees
Frivolous appeal (appellate sanctions) NDHFA: Appeal is frivolous, fees should be awarded Fendee: Appeal is on a genuine question of first impression Appeal not frivolous; no sanctions

Key Cases Cited

  • Borsheim Builder Supply, Inc. v. Manger Ins., Inc., 917 N.W.2d 504 (N.D. 2018) (standard for summary judgment and appellate review)
  • Forsman v. Blues, Brews & Bar-B-Ques, Inc., 903 N.W.2d 524 (N.D. 2017) (summary judgment procedure and standards)
  • Miller v. Nodak Ins. Co., 987 N.W.2d 369 (N.D. 2023) (requirements for opposing summary judgment)
  • Bravera Bank v. Craft, 997 N.W.2d 829 (N.D. 2023) (summary judgment standards and burden of proof)
  • Dogbe v. Dogbe, 993 N.W.2d 491 (N.D. 2023) (review standard for attorney’s fees awards)
  • Schmitz v. N.D. State Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 971 N.W.2d 892 (N.D. 2022) (abuse of discretion defined)
  • Lizakowski v. Lizakowski, 893 N.W.2d 508 (N.D. 2017) (American Rule on attorney's fees)
  • Buchholz v. Buchholz, 982 N.W.2d 275 (N.D. 2022) (standard for awarding appellate attorney’s fees for frivolous appeal)
  • In re O.F., 773 N.W.2d 206 (N.D. 2009) (identification of non-frivolous appeals on first impression issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: NDIC v. Gould
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 22, 2024
Citations: 3 N.W.3d 151; 2024 ND 32; 20230188
Docket Number: 20230188
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In
    NDIC v. Gould, 3 N.W.3d 151