History
  • No items yet
midpage
2019 Ohio 3647
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Original oil and gas lease (310 acres) had a 20-year primary term and a secondary term that continued "so much longer thereafter as oil, gas, or their constituents are produced in paying quantities". 58 acres conveyed to the Naus in 1993; that 58 acres lies within a 147-acre portion of the 310-acre lease tract.
  • The Noll C. and Baker C. Well #1 ("Baker #1"), drilled 1975, was identified in discovery as the only well on the 147-acre portion; Positron (lessee successor) and Stonebridge (operator) conceded Baker #1 produced no oil or gas from 2000–2005 in discovery responses and produced a Well Completion Report showing gaps in production.
  • The Naus (and intervenor Siltstone) moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory termination of the lease for nonproduction in paying quantities; defendants delayed and later filed an opposition attaching an affidavit from Stonebridge’s manager (Eddy Biehl) and various discovery documents.
  • The trial court ordered defendants to identify any other wells on the leased premises; defendants did not identify additional wells and later failed to oppose the renewed summary-judgment motion, and the trial court granted summary judgment declaring the lease terminated.
  • The appellate court held that, absent a Pugh clause or contrary lease language, an oil-and-gas lease is indivisible (production on any part preserves the whole), but the record established Baker #1 was the only well on the entire leasehold and it produced no oil/gas during the relevant period; the Biehl affidavit’s contested portions were inadmissible because they were based on belief, not personal knowledge.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether lease is divisible or leases are perpetuated by production on any portion Nau: lease indivisible; must show nonproduction across entire leasehold; Baker #1 is the only well and had no production Stonebridge/Positron: defendants suggested other wells/owners may exist on the 310-acre tract and production elsewhere preserves lease Court: lease is presumptively indivisible absent Pugh clause; but record showed Baker #1 was the only well on entire leasehold, so the Naus met burden
Whether evidence offered by defendants created genuine issue of material fact about production or other wells Nau: discovery admissions and the 2013 report establish nonproduction; defendants failed to identify other wells when ordered Defs: Biehl affidavit and attached documents (ODNR maps, suspense lists, tax forms, prior settlement check, repair invoices) indicate other wells, royalties held, and prior litigation resolving nonproduction Court: Biehl’s relevant averments were based on belief (not personal knowledge) and thus inadmissible; documentary items did not show paying-quantity production or additional wells; no genuine issue remained
Whether affidavit and discovery documents were admissible to defeat summary judgment Nau: defendants’ affidavit fails Civ.R.56(E) personal-knowledge requirement; unauthenticated docs carry little weight Defs: documents produced in discovery and affidavit suffice to raise issues Court: affidavit portions based on belief cannot create genuine factual issue; documents produced in discovery may be considered but here they did not establish production or other wells sufficient to avoid summary judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102 (Ohio 1996) (de novo appellate review of summary-judgment rulings)
  • Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317 (Ohio 1977) (summary-judgment standard; view evidence most favorably to nonmoving party)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (Ohio 1996) (moving party’s initial burden and nonmoving party’s reciprocal burden in summary judgment practice)
  • Swallie v. Rousenberg, 190 Ohio App.3d 473 (7th Dist. 2010) (secondary term ends when production in paying quantities ceases)
  • Neuhart v. TransAtlantic Energy Corp., 121 N.E.3d 802 (7th Dist. 2018) (lease indivisibility absent contrary lease language)
  • Mathews v. Sun Oil Co., 425 S.W.2d 330 (Tex. 1968) (production on one tract perpetuates the lease as to all tracts absent contrary intent)
  • Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co., 95 Ohio St.3d 314 (Ohio 2002) (definition and requirement of personal knowledge for affidavits)
  • Potts v. Unglaciated Indus., Inc., 77 N.E.3d 415 (7th Dist. 2016) (discussion of Civ.R.56(E) personal-knowledge defects and waiver)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nau v. Stonebridge Operating Co.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 6, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 3647; 19 NO 0466
Docket Number: 19 NO 0466
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Nau v. Stonebridge Operating Co., 2019 Ohio 3647