midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2010 Ohio 6068
Ohio Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Accident Feb 24, 2001; Guide One paid Delacruz medical expenses $5,000; Guide One filed inter-company subrogation on Feb 8, 2003; Delacruz settled with Alt for $15,000 with Nationwide settlement; Release indemnifies Alt and others and requires indemnification for subrogation claims; Arbitration awarded Guide One $5,000 on Apr 3, 2007; Nationwide paid $5,000 to Guide One on May 28, 2008; Nationwide filed suit against Delacruz May 27, 2009 seeking indemnification and unjust enrichment; trial court granted Delacruz summary judgment, holding Guide One’s filing did not toll the limitations period and that unjust enrichment did not apply due to an express contract.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Preservation of subrogation claim by arbitration tolling Guide One timely filed arbitration within 2-year limit Arbitration filing does not constitute commencement to toll statute Guide One’s filing did not toll the statute; no error in summary judgment
Unjust enrichment where express contract exists Contract does not negate unjust enrichment claim Express contract bars unjust enrichment Unjust enrichment barred due to existence of an express contract

Key Cases Cited

  • Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Buckley, 2006-Ohio-5362 (9th Dist 2006) (subrogation tolling debated; 2-year limit applied to subrogation claims)
  • Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zimmerman, 2004-Ohio-7115 (5th Dist 2004) (presentment for payment does not toll statute; no commencement under R.C. 2305.17)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Delacruz
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 13, 2010
Citations: 2010 Ohio 6068; 5-10-17
Docket Number: 5-10-17
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In