midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
48 Pa. D. & C.5th 491
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Nationstar Mortgage, LLC moved for summary judgment in a Pennsylvania mortgage foreclosure; hearing held May 26, 2015; motion granted.
  • Defendants Angel L. Martinez and Maria C. Martinez are mortgagors and record owners of 25 East Coleman Street, Allentown, PA.
  • Mortgage executed October 31, 2006 to MERS as nominee for K. Hovanian American Mortgage, LLC.
  • A Loan Modification Agreement dated August 28, 2012 amended and supplemented the original mortgage and was between Bank of America, N.A. and the Defendants.
  • April 23, 2014 assignment to Nationstar; modification referenced in Exhibit C was not separately referenced in the assignment.
  • Court held Nationstar has standing to enforce the mortgage as amended by the Loan Modification Agreement, despite lack of a separate assignment of the modification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does Nationstar have standing to enforce the loan as amended? Nationstar as assignee stands in assignor’s shoes and may enforce the amended mortgage. Standing requires explicit assignment of the modification agreement separate from the mortgage. Nationstar has standing to enforce the mortgage as amended.
Does modification alter the status of the mortgage such that the assignment covers the modified terms? Modification substitutes for the original mortgage; terms are integrated into the assigned mortgage. Modification effects were not expressly assigned, so enforcement of modified terms is improper. Modification is integrated into the mortgage; assignment covers the amended terms.
Is pretrial summary judgment appropriate where the mortgage amount, default, and nonpayment are undisputed? Threshold requirements for summary judgment are satisfied since there is no genuine dispute on those elements. No challenge noted to elements; argues other issues about standing. Summary judgment proper on the undisputed foreclosure elements.

Key Cases Cited

  • Swartley v. Hoffner, 734 A.2d 915 (Pa. Super. 1999) (pretrial disposition standard for summary judgment in mortgage foreclosures)
  • Younginger v. Heckler, 410 A.2d 340 (Pa. Super. 1979) (genuine issues of material fact required for trial)
  • Cunningham v. McWilliams, 714 A.2d 1054 (Pa. Super. 1998) (standing and summary judgment in mortgage actions; default rules)
  • Mallory (US Bank N.A. v. Mallory), 982 A.2d 986 (Pa. Super. 2009) (real party in interest; assignee stands in assignor’s shoes)
  • Murray (JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Murray), 63 A.3d 1258 (Pa. Super. 2013) (standing to enforce a note; assignee authority)
  • CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Davis, 2014-Ohio-3292 (Ohio 2014) (loan modification does not change party status absent specific provision)
  • Melat v. Melat, 602 A.2d 380 (Pa. Super. 1992) (modification substitutes for original contract to extent altered)
  • Knight v. Gulf Refining Co., 166 A.2d 880 (Pa. 1933) (contract modification principles in Pennsylvania)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nationstar Mortage LLC v. Martinez
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
Date Published: Jun 10, 2015
Citations: 48 Pa. D. & C.5th 491; No. 2014-C-1584
Docket Number: No. 2014-C-1584
Log In
    Nationstar Mortage LLC v. Martinez, 48 Pa. D. & C.5th 491