midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
334 So.3d 413
La. Ct. App.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • The Josephs filed a legal-malpractice suit in 2004; the trial court dismissed it with prejudice in May 2006.
  • The Josephs filed a timely motion for appeal in 2006, but the motion was not signed by the trial court until 2016.
  • In 2013 the Josephs filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and failed to disclose the malpractice claim, raising the issue that the bankruptcy trustee might hold the claim.
  • This litigation produced multiple appellate rulings: Joseph I (remanding for the trial court to sign the appeal) and Joseph II (reversing the 2006 dismissal and remanding).
  • In 2017 the trial court conditionally granted defendant Wasserman’s exception of no right of action and stayed the Josephs’ claims pending notice to the bankruptcy trustee.
  • On December 10, 2020 the trial court denied the Josephs’ petition for sequestration and their bifurcated motion to intervene and amend; the Josephs appealed, and this Court dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction and declined to exercise supervisory jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the December 10, 2020 judgments (denying sequestration and denying motion to intervene/amend) are appealable Josephs proceeded by ordinary appeal to obtain review of those denials Wasserman (and the court) contended the orders are interlocutory/non-final and not appealable Court: judgments are not final or expressly appealable; appeal dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction
Whether the appellate court should convert the improper appeal to an application for supervisory writ and exercise jurisdiction Josephs had already sought supervisory review and sought appellate review Wasserman opposed conversion; court noted discretion to convert but considered prior writ practice Court declined to convert because the writ route had already been attempted and denied; it declined to exercise supervisory jurisdiction

Key Cases Cited

  • Joseph v. Wasserman, 237 So.3d 14 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2018) (prior appellate decision summarizing the case history)
  • Joseph v. Wasserman, 194 So.3d 720 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2016) (Joseph I) (directing trial court to sign the timely-filed appeal)
  • Joseph v. Wasserman, 206 So.3d 970 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2016) (Joseph II) (reversing the trial court's dismissal)
  • Schwarzenberger v. Louisiana State Univ. Health Sciences Ctr.-New Orleans, 263 So.3d 449 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2019) (appellate courts must determine sua sponte whether they have jurisdiction)
  • Embrace Home Loans, Inc. v. Burl, 318 So.3d 86 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2018) (finality requirement for invoking appellate jurisdiction)
  • Thrasher Const., Inc. v. Gibbs Residential, L.L.C., 197 So.3d 283 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2016) (appealability of final and partial final judgments)
  • Dupuy Storage & Forwarding, LLC v. Max Speciality Ins. Co., 203 So.3d 337 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2016) (appellate court has discretion to convert an improper appeal to a writ application)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nathaniel Joseph and Kecia Joseph v. Gerald D. Wasserman
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 17, 2021
Citations: 334 So.3d 413; 2021-CA-0138
Docket Number: 2021-CA-0138
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In