2022 Ohio 3232
Ohio Ct. App.2022Background
- May 2018: Nadrowski fell while crossing E. 36th Street after leaving a flea market; she was in a dense crowd and could not see the street ahead.
- She testified her feet struck an uneven portion of the street (near a fire hydrant/orange pipes) with a difference in elevation of two inches or more; she did not photograph the area until October 2018.
- Nadrowski sued the City of Cleveland (filed May 2020), alleging negligence for failure to maintain the public roadway.
- The City asserted statutory political-subdivision immunity under R.C. Chapter 2744 and moved for summary judgment.
- City records show crews inspected E. 36th Street 10 days before the accident and no complaints were recorded; City supervisor testified a two-inch elevation would have been ramped if present then.
- Trial court granted summary judgment for the City, concluding the R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) exception (failure to keep public roads in repair / remove obstructions) did not apply; appeal followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a >2-inch elevation on a public road constitutes a defect "in repair" under R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) | Two-inch (or greater) elevation is a lack of repair making City liable | Two-inch rule applies to sidewalks/walkways, not public roadways; a 2" difference does not make the road "in disrepair" | Two-inch rule inapplicable to road; 2" difference alone did not trigger the §2744.02(B)(3) exception; immunity stands |
| Whether City had actual or constructive notice of the defect | Photos and attendant circumstances (crowd) establish a substantial defect and notice | Plaintiff cannot identify exact fall location; photos taken months later; City inspected the area days before and had no notice or complaints | No evidence of actual or constructive notice; genuine issue of material fact not shown; City entitled to summary judgment |
Key Cases Cited
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102, 671 N.E.2d 241 (summary judgment standard; de novo review)
- Smith v. McBride, 130 Ohio St.3d 51, 955 N.E.2d 954 (three-step political-subdivision immunity framework)
- Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215, 790 N.E.2d 781 (analysis of immunity exceptions)
- Lambert v. Clancy, 125 Ohio St.3d 231, 927 N.E.2d 585 (political-subdivision immunity principles)
- Howard v. Miami Twp. Fire Div., 119 Ohio St.3d 1, 891 N.E.2d 311 (definition of "obstruction" for roads)
- Cash v. Cincinnati, 66 Ohio St.2d 319, 421 N.E.2d 1275 (two-inch rule for sidewalks/walkways)
- Cleveland v. Amato, 123 Ohio St. 575, 176 N.E. 227 (municipal liability tied to actual or constructive notice)
- Bradshaw v. New Village Corp., 95 N.E.3d 446 (statutory amendment consequences; sidewalks removed from §2744.02(B)(3) exceptions)
