midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2022 Ohio 3232
Ohio Ct. App.
2022
Read the full case

Background

  • May 2018: Nadrowski fell while crossing E. 36th Street after leaving a flea market; she was in a dense crowd and could not see the street ahead.
  • She testified her feet struck an uneven portion of the street (near a fire hydrant/orange pipes) with a difference in elevation of two inches or more; she did not photograph the area until October 2018.
  • Nadrowski sued the City of Cleveland (filed May 2020), alleging negligence for failure to maintain the public roadway.
  • The City asserted statutory political-subdivision immunity under R.C. Chapter 2744 and moved for summary judgment.
  • City records show crews inspected E. 36th Street 10 days before the accident and no complaints were recorded; City supervisor testified a two-inch elevation would have been ramped if present then.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment for the City, concluding the R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) exception (failure to keep public roads in repair / remove obstructions) did not apply; appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a >2-inch elevation on a public road constitutes a defect "in repair" under R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) Two-inch (or greater) elevation is a lack of repair making City liable Two-inch rule applies to sidewalks/walkways, not public roadways; a 2" difference does not make the road "in disrepair" Two-inch rule inapplicable to road; 2" difference alone did not trigger the §2744.02(B)(3) exception; immunity stands
Whether City had actual or constructive notice of the defect Photos and attendant circumstances (crowd) establish a substantial defect and notice Plaintiff cannot identify exact fall location; photos taken months later; City inspected the area days before and had no notice or complaints No evidence of actual or constructive notice; genuine issue of material fact not shown; City entitled to summary judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102, 671 N.E.2d 241 (summary judgment standard; de novo review)
  • Smith v. McBride, 130 Ohio St.3d 51, 955 N.E.2d 954 (three-step political-subdivision immunity framework)
  • Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215, 790 N.E.2d 781 (analysis of immunity exceptions)
  • Lambert v. Clancy, 125 Ohio St.3d 231, 927 N.E.2d 585 (political-subdivision immunity principles)
  • Howard v. Miami Twp. Fire Div., 119 Ohio St.3d 1, 891 N.E.2d 311 (definition of "obstruction" for roads)
  • Cash v. Cincinnati, 66 Ohio St.2d 319, 421 N.E.2d 1275 (two-inch rule for sidewalks/walkways)
  • Cleveland v. Amato, 123 Ohio St. 575, 176 N.E. 227 (municipal liability tied to actual or constructive notice)
  • Bradshaw v. New Village Corp., 95 N.E.3d 446 (statutory amendment consequences; sidewalks removed from §2744.02(B)(3) exceptions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Nadrowski v. Cleveland
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 15, 2022
Citations: 2022 Ohio 3232; 111139
Docket Number: 111139
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In