Myers v. Bedway Land
2017 Ohio 1255
Ohio Ct. App.2017Background
- Surface owners (Appellees) purchased ~631 acres between 2004–2011; deeds reserved oil, gas, and coal.
- Appellants (McLaughlin heirs) claim severed mineral interests derived from 1921 deeds via intestate succession.
- Appellees published notices of intent to declare mineral abandonment in 2011 and recorded affidavits of abandonment; an heir (Lucretia Vandemark) recorded an affidavit preserving minerals within 60 days.
- Appellees filed a declaratory-judgment/quiet-title action in December 2012 under the 1989 Ohio Dormant Mineral Act (ODMA) seeking to revest disputed minerals in the surface estate.
- The trial court granted summary judgment for Appellees applying the 1989 ODMA (finding abandonment). Appellants appealed.
- On appeal, the court considered whether the 1989 ODMA applied to claims filed after the 2006 ODMA and whether Appellants preserved their mineral interests under the 2006 ODMA.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Which ODMA version governs claims filed after 2006? | Myers: 1989 ODMA controls; abandonment occurs and quiet-title can revest minerals. | McLaughlin Heirs: 2006 ODMA governs claims filed after its effective date. | The 2006 ODMA governs claims asserted after its effective date; the 1989 ODMA is inapplicable. |
| 2. Is the 1989 ODMA self-executing? | Myers: relied on trial-court application of 1989 ODMA to find automatic abandonment. | McLaughlin Heirs: 1989 ODMA was not self-executing; 2006 statute prescribes procedures. | 1989 ODMA was not self-executing; Corban requires following 2006 ODMA procedures for post-2006 claims. |
| 3. Did Appellants preserve their mineral interests under the 2006 ODMA? | Myers: contended affidavits of abandonment and publication satisfied requirements. | McLaughlin Heirs: pointed to timely preservation affidavit filed within 60 days of notice, preserving their rights. | Evidence showed a preservation affidavit filed within 60 days; Appellants preserved their rights under the 2006 ODMA. |
| 4. Remedy on summary judgment given preservation affidavit? | Myers: sought summary judgment quieting title in surface owners. | McLaughlin Heirs: sought summary judgment in their favor because 2006 ODMA procedures were not satisfied to extinguish their rights. | Trial court's grant for Appellees reversed; remanded with instruction to enter summary judgment for Appellants. |
Key Cases Cited
- Albanese v. Batman, 148 Ohio St.3d 85 (challenge to whether surface owner complied with 2006 ODMA notice and affidavit requirements)
