History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 6889
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • MWCD leased real property around fourteen lakes for cottage sites with maintenance guidelines.
  • MWCD alleged Kellar violated the lease by inoperative/unlicensed vehicles, debris and cat litter accumulation, and unrestrained dogs.
  • MWCD gave notices of violation and terminated the lease effective August 8, 2010.
  • MWCD filed a breach of contract and declaratory judgment action on August 10, 2010; service by certified mail was unclaimed; regular mail pursuant to Civ.R. 4(D) was sent September 3, 2010.
  • Default judgment was entered October 12, 2010 ordering eviction within 30 days and sale of unremoved property.
  • Kellar moved under Civ.R. 60(B) to vacate; evidentiary hearing held January 24, 2011; trial court denied relief; judgment affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Civ.R.60(B) relief was warranted Kellar claimed excusable neglect entitles relief. MWCD contends 60(B) relief requires meritorious defense and timely filing. No; relief denied as criteria not satisfied.
Whether failure to respond constitutes excusable neglect Kellar relied on misunderstandings and relied on others to handle responses. Neglect based on misunderstanding is not excusable. Not excusable neglect.
Whether Kellar presented a meritorious defense Kellar was singled out while others violated the lease. No evidence of discriminatory intent or breach by MWCD; no meritorious defense shown. No meritorious defense shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • GTE Automatic Elec. v. ARC Indus., 47 Ohio St.2d 146 (Ohio 1976) (three-part test for Rule 60(B) relief)
  • Katko v. Modic, 85 Ohio App.3d 834 (Ohio App.3d 1993) (excusable neglect not established by mere failure to respond)
  • Associated Estates Corp. v. Fellows, 11 Ohio App.3d 112 (Ohio App.3d 1983) (lack of reading notices not excusable neglect)
  • Griffey v. Rajan, 33 Ohio St.3d 75 (Ohio 1987) (discretion of trial court in 60(B) matters; abuse of discretion standard)
  • State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner, 76 Ohio St.3d 149 (Ohio 1996) (Civ.R.60(B) relief requires meritorious defense and timely filing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Kellar
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 30, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 6889; 2011AP020009
Docket Number: 2011AP020009
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Kellar, 2011 Ohio 6889