History
  • No items yet
midpage
44 A.3d 162
Vt.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Taxpayer appeals a civil-division order dismissing her Rule 75 abatement challenge.
  • She contends the superior court erred in limiting her abatement appeal because she did not challenge property valuation in the appraisal process.
  • Historical context: contamination discovered in 1994; prior attempts to appeal valuations in 1995–1996 were unsuccessful.
  • Board of Abatement previously reduced an appraisal by $10,000 but did not declare the property worthless.
  • From 1995 onward, taxes accrued with a substantial lien; no tax sale occurred; taxpayer later conducted her own tests showing contamination.
  • Trial court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, holding that she must exhaust valuation-based remedies through a tax appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May abatement appeal proceed despite no valuation appeal? Garbitelli allows Rule 75 review of abatement denial without exhausting valuation appeal. Taxpayers must exhaust appraisal routes and cannot bypass via Rule 75. Abatement appeal may proceed under Rule 75.
Is the abatement proceeding on-the-record certiorari with potential for additional evidence? Abatement review may admit additional evidence if appropriate. Necessity and scope of new evidence are discretionary and not guaranteed. Question left for trial court to decide on remand.
Does the complaint state a claim for abatement relief? Complaint alleges illegality or unfairness in taxes and lack of impartiality. Abatement pleading hinges on valueless property and may be insufficient. Complaint sufficient to survive dismissal; liberal pleading applies.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garbitelli v. Town of Brookfield, 2011 VT 122; 191 Vt. 76, 38 A.3d 1133 (Vt. 2011) (tax abatement review under Rule 75 is permissible and on-the-record, not tied to valuation appeal)
  • In re City of Barre, 134 Vt. 519; 365 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1976) (statutory tax appeal process cannot be bypassed by a horizontal appeal)
  • Town of Bennington, 161 Vt. 573; 641 A.2d 1331 (Vt. 1993) (review is narrow; abatement is not the same as valuation appeal)
  • Allen v. Town of W. Windsor, 2004 VT 51; 177 Vt. 1, 852 A.2d 627 (Vt. 2004) (tax appraisals must reflect fair market value)
  • Town of Barnet v. Cent. Vt. Pub. Serv. Corp., 131 Vt. 578; 313 A.2d 392 (Vt. 1973) (appraisers lack authority to abate taxes; abatement authority exists separately)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. City of Burlington
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Feb 7, 2012
Citations: 44 A.3d 162; 191 Vt. 597; 2012 Vt. LEXIS 12; 2012 VT 11; No. 11-111
Docket Number: No. 11-111
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
Log In