History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mullins v. Wicker
2017 Ohio 5663
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Little Ettie Old Regular Baptist Church (congregational, self-governing) split into two factions after disputes in late 2011–early 2012 over women's voting rights and continued participation in the New Salem Association.
  • Appellees (trustees Mullins, Mathews, Osborne) sued Appellants (members including Wicker et al.) in 2012 seeking injunctive relief and to protect church property and funds; appellants counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment that they were the true members.
  • The trial court initially issued a temporary schedule for alternating weekend access to the church during litigation; later converted that schedule into a permanent injunction.
  • The court found certain meetings held by Appellants (Jan. 25, 2012; May 9, 2015) improper and without force, but concluded neither side proved entitlement to full ownership; instead it found two congregations equally entitled to possession and control of church real and personal property.
  • Appellants appealed, arguing (1) the court erred in finding two congregations equally entitled to property and (2) the permanent injunction was improper. The appellate court affirmed, finding competent, credible evidence supported the trial court's findings and that the injunction was not an abuse of discretion.

Issues

Issue Mullins (Plaintiff/Appellee) Argument Wicker (Defendant/Appellant) Argument Held
Whether the court should declare one faction the sole lawful members entitled to church property Mullins: Appellees argued appellants failed to prove they were sole lawful members; both factions have rights and evidence supports no sole-owner finding Wicker: Appellants argued majority rule and historical practice should give them exclusive control; meetings excluding others validated their claim Court: Affirmed trial court — neither side proved exclusive entitlement; found two congregations equally own and occupy the property
Whether temporary scheduling order should be converted to a permanent injunction dividing use/access Mullins: Injunction necessary to prevent dissipation of assets and future harm; court may fashion equitable relief Wicker: Permanent injunction improperly limits majority governance and forecloses future lawful changes by majority Court: Affirmed — trial court did not abuse discretion in issuing permanent injunction with detailed sharing and approval provisions
Whether trial court had jurisdiction or should abstain due to ecclesiastical questions Mullins: Court may adjudicate secular property/control issues in congregational church under neutral-principles / proper-authority review Wicker: Dispute is ecclesiastical (doctrine, membership, leadership) and civil courts lack jurisdiction under ecclesiastical abstention Court: Exercised jurisdiction narrowly; applied neutral/practice review and limited inquiry to governance procedures and whether meetings were proper, consistent with precedent
Whether trial-court factual findings (improper meetings, voting practice history) were against manifest weight Mullins: Trial-court credibility determinations and findings supported by record Wicker: Argued court misapplied law and created compromise remedy not grounded in majority rule Court: Findings supported by competent, credible evidence; appellate court will not reweigh credibility — affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595 (U.S. 1979) (endorses neutral-principles approach for resolving church property disputes)
  • Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328 (Ohio 2012) (standard for reviewing manifest-weight claims)
  • Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77 (Ohio 1984) (deference to trial court on witness credibility)
  • State ex rel. Morrow v. Hill, 51 Ohio St.2d 74 (Ohio 1977) (distinguishes hierarchical vs. congregational polity for jurisdictional analysis)
  • Smith v. White, 7 N.E.3d 552 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014) (congregational churches are governed by their own procedures; courts limited to secular, non-ecclesiastical questions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mullins v. Wicker
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 22, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 5663
Docket Number: 16CA872
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.