History
  • No items yet
midpage
861 F. Supp. 2d 411
D. Del.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Council opens meetings with Lord’s Prayer, led by Council President, allegedly Christian and sectarian.
  • Plaintiffs attend meetings, are offended by recitation, and seek relief under Establishment Clause.
  • Complaint asserts US and Delaware Constitution violations; standing and merits challenged by defendants.
  • Procedural posture: complaint filed; motions to dismiss and for preliminary injunction; record supplemented; stay of discovery.
  • Court adopts Marsh framework and analyzes whether prayer advances one faith and endorses Christianity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing to challenge practice Plaintiffs have injury-in-fact from direct exposure No prudential standing; no concrete injury Plaintiffs have Article III and prudential standing
Establishment Clause under US Constitution Prayer advances Christianity; government endorsement Marsh permits nonsectarian or acceptable practice Likely violation; distinctly Christian prayer unconstitutional
Delaware Constitution claim Delaware art. I, §1 protects conscience and prohibits preference Same analysis as US Clause; no unique Delaware issue Claim survives under Delaware Constitution
Preliminary injunction standards Irreparable harm and likelihood of success; public interest favors relief Relief premature; harm to defendants Grant of preliminary injunction warranted; stay of effect for 30 days

Key Cases Cited

  • Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (U.S. 1983) (legislative prayer history; nonsectarian aspects matter but not dispositive)
  • County of Allegheny v. ACLU Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573 (U.S. 1989) (limits Marsh; cannot affiliate government with one faith)
  • Joyner v. Forsyth County, 653 F.3d 341 (4th Cir. 2011) (invocations must be nonsectarian to include all faiths)
  • Pelphrey v. Cobb County, 547 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2008) (diversity of religious expressions supported no advancement of a single faith)
  • Wynne v. Town of Great Falls, 376 F.3d 292 (4th Cir. 2004) (sectarian prayers unconstitutional when advancing Christianity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mullin v. Sussex County
Court Name: District Court, D. Delaware
Date Published: May 15, 2012
Citations: 861 F. Supp. 2d 411; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67571; 2012 WL 1753662; C.A. No. 11-580-LPS
Docket Number: C.A. No. 11-580-LPS
Court Abbreviation: D. Del.
Log In
    Mullin v. Sussex County, 861 F. Supp. 2d 411