History
  • No items yet
midpage
Muldoon v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund
2012 ND 244
| N.D. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • WSI determined Lauth Contracting, LLC had no workers’ compensation coverage after Morin’s 2008 injury claim.
  • WSI concluded Muldoon and Lauth were partners in Lauth Contracting, LLC; Muldoon was personally liable for past premiums and penalties.
  • ALJ found Muldoon and Lauth formed a partnership; Muldoon managed finances and accounts while Lauth did the labor and supervision.
  • Muldoon opened bank accounts and authorized payments, with Lauth having limited access; Muldoon and Lauth’s relationship and roles were contested.
  • The ALJ held Muldoon was Muldoon’s employer of Morin and other employees, and Muldoon willfully failed to secure coverage.
  • District court affirmed; Muldoon appealed, challenging employer status, willful violation, and personal liability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Muldoon an employer under N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(17)? Muldoon did not hire or fire employees; partnership status not shown. Muldoon and Lauth were partners; partners are employees of the partnership. Yes; Muldoon was an employer under the statute.
Did Muldoon willfully fail to secure workers’ compensation coverage? Muldoon knowingly avoided coverage for Lauth Contracting’s employees. Muldoon lacked knowledge of the statutory requirements and the employment relationship. Yes; Muldoon willfully failed to provide coverage.
Is Muldoon personally liable for past premiums and penalties? Liability attaches to the employer, including partners; Muldoon acted as an employer personally. The nature of liability depends on timing of partnership vs LLC formation; issues not fully raised below. Muldoon is personally liable for past premiums and penalties.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bishop v. N.D. Workforce Safety and Ins. , 2012 ND 217 (North Dakota Supreme Court 2012) (appellate deferential review of ALJ factual findings)
  • Johnson v. N.D. Workforce Safety and Ins. , 2012 ND 87 (North Dakota Supreme Court 2012) (standard for reviewing agency findings)
  • Mickelson v. N.D. Workforce Safety and Ins. , 2012 ND 164 (North Dakota Supreme Court 2012) (credibility of witnesses; defer to hearing officer)
  • Paulson v. Paulson, 2011 ND 159 (North Dakota Supreme Court 2011) (issues not raised below cannot be raised on appeal)
  • Unser v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau, 1999 ND 129 (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999) (principle against raising new issues on appeal)
  • Forbes v. Workforce Safety and Ins. Fund, 2006 ND 208 (North Dakota Supreme Court 2006) (willful conduct in 65-04-33 context)
  • Klemmens v. N.D. Workmen’s Comp. Bureau, 54 N.D. 496 (North Dakota Supreme Court 1926) (personal liability when partnership operates the business)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Muldoon v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 27, 2012
Citation: 2012 ND 244
Docket Number: 20120273
Court Abbreviation: N.D.