History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 3614
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mountaineer Investments holds judgments and forecloses on properties owned by Performance, including 4905 Porterfield Drive.
  • Edward and Jewell Jones own Porterfield Drive; they claimed a land installment contract with Performance, not tenancy.
  • After foreclosure, the trial court confirmed sale and issued writs of restitution; Joneses were served eviction notices.
  • Joneses moved under Civ.R. 60(B) to vacate the sale confirmation and writs; court denied, and ordered immediate vacate.
  • Appeal challenged the denial of the motion to vacate sale and the denial of the writs; multiple counterclaims remained unresolved.
  • Appellate court later dismissed the appeal from the sale confirmation for lack of a final order and dismissed the writs appeal as moot.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the appeal from the denial of the motion to vacate sale final? Joneses contend denial of sale-vacate is final despite unresolved counterclaims. Mountaineer argues there is no final order due to pending counterclaims. Appeal dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.
Is the appeal from the denial of the writs of restitution moot? Joneses seek review of writs of restitution despite ongoing proceedings. Writs moot once tenants vacate and possession is restored to landlord. Appeal moot; post-appeal events render review unnecessary.
Should the writ of restitution appeal have been considered at all given procedural posture? Due process requires addressing counterclaims before dismissal. The issue should be moot once possession is regained and no relief remains. Denied due to mootness and lack of final appealable order.

Key Cases Cited

  • Goldstein v. Patel, 2003-Ohio-4386 (Ohio App. Dist.) (for forcible entry and detainer, mootness when possession returns to landlord)
  • Fast Prop. Solutions, Inc. v. Jurczenko, 2010-Ohio-5933 (Ohio App. Dist.) (merits moot after tenant vacates and possession ends)
  • Townsend v. Antioch Univ., 2009-Ohio-2552 (Ohio App. Dist.) (judicial notice of post-appeal events to resolve mootness)
  • Ussher v. Ussher, 2011-Ohio-1440 (Ohio App. Dist.) (judicial notice and mootness principles quoted)
  • Seventh Urban Inc. v. Univ. Circle Prop. Dev. Inc., 67 Ohio St.2d 19 (1981) (forbids beyond-issue mootness considerations and link to eviction/rem/possession)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mountaineer Invests., L.L.C. v. Performance Home Buyers, L.L.C.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 22, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 3614; 24173
Docket Number: 24173
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Mountaineer Invests., L.L.C. v. Performance Home Buyers, L.L.C., 2011 Ohio 3614