History
  • No items yet
midpage
89 So. 3d 41
Miss. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mosley was convicted by a Choctaw County jury of possession of marijuana and cocaine after a traffic stop of a Tahoe in which marijuana and a gun were found.
  • Officers stopped the Tahoe for alleged nonfunctional brake lights and turn signals; Mosley was a passenger and admitted marijuana was inside a baggie box in the vehicle.
  • The MBN agent observed marijuana in plain sight during the stop and Mosley admitted there was more marijuana and a gun in the Tahoe.
  • A search of the vehicle yielded marijuana, crack cocaine, and a Colt pistol; Mosley and his girlfriend were arrested, with the girlfriend later released from citations.
  • Mosley moved to suppress the drugs and gun; the circuit court denied the motion, finding probable cause for the stop and a lawful search.
  • At trial, the court gave a constructive-possession instruction (C-2); Mosley requested D-1 and D-4, which were refused; the jury convicted on marijuana and cocaine counts but not the firearm count.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the stop and ensuing search complied with the Fourth Amendment Mosley contends the stop was pretextual and unlawful. State asserts probable cause existed for the traffic violation and the search was permissible. Stop/search reasonable; no Fourth Amendment violation.
Whether the circuit court properly instructed on constructive possession Mosley argues D-1 and D-4 should have been given in addition to C-2. C-2 adequately states the law of constructive possession; D-1 and D-4 were not needed. Refusal of D-1 and D-4 not reversible; C-2 fairly announced the law.
Whether the evidence was sufficient and the verdict warranted a new trial on weight The evidence was insufficient or outweighed; conviction should be reversed. Evidence supported conviction beyond a reasonable doubt; no weight-based reversal warranted. Evidence sufficient to convict; no weight-based reversal.

Key Cases Cited

  • McCollins v. State, 798 So.2d 624 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001) (plain-view and arrest permit search of vehicle)
  • Curry v. State, 249 So.2d 414 (Miss. 1971) (constructive possession elements; dominion/control)
  • Powell v. State, 355 So.2d 1378 (Miss. 1978) (premises-not-exclusive rule; required incriminating evidence)
  • Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (U.S. 2007) (passenger seizure during traffic stop; stop authority)
  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1996) (probable cause-based traffic-stop standard; objective test)
  • Adams v. City of Booneville, 910 So.2d 720 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005) (objective reasonable suspicion for careless driving)
  • Bates v. State, 952 So.2d 320 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) (constructive-possession instruction sufficiency not required by itself)
  • Smith v. State, 839 So.2d 489 (Miss. 2003) (constructive possession requires dominion and awareness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mosley v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Oct 18, 2011
Citations: 89 So. 3d 41; 2011 WL 5027142; 2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 639; No. 2010-KA-00467-COA
Docket Number: No. 2010-KA-00467-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Mosley v. State, 89 So. 3d 41