History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morris v. City of Virginia Beach
58 Va. App. 173
| Va. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Morris, a commercial truck driver, was cited for exceeding width and failing to secure a load on a tractor-trailer.
  • Officer F.D. Godwin observed an oversized load on Morris’s trailer, width extending beyond 8'6" and carrying unsecured boxes on top.
  • The observed width appeared to exceed statutory maximums, prompting a traffic stop and investigation.
  • Morris could not produce a special single-trip permit; he did present a blanket permit that did not authorize the 12'4" width.
  • Officer Godwin noted escort vehicles and oversize signage but did not find evidence of a permit exemption at the scene.
  • Trial court denied suppression and Morris was convicted of two violations under City Code § 21-1 incorporating Virginia Code provisions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the stop lawful under the Fourth Amendment? Morris contends the stop was without lawful basis and should be suppressed. City argues officer had reasonable suspicion based on width exceeded and related indicators. Yes; stop supported by reasonable suspicion from width violation and accompanying load indicators.
Do permit-like precautions negate reasonable suspicion when a permit might exist? Morris argues permit indicators mean there was no basis to stop. City contends permit possibilities do not negate initial prima facie violation and do not force presumption of a permit. No; presence of permit-like precautions does not automatically negate suspicion, officer may investigate.
Can an oversized-load width violation justify an investigatory stop under Virginia law? Morris asserts the statute and permit framework preclude a stop absent explicit permit confirmation. City maintains width violation plus load indicators justify brief investigatory stop to verify permit status. Yes; width violation plus supporting indicators justify a brief investigatory stop.

Key Cases Cited

  • Glenn v. Commonwealth, 49 Va.App. 413 (2007) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings; view evidence in light favorable to Commonwealth)
  • Raab v. Commonwealth, 50 Va.App. 577 (2007) (objective assessment of officer's actions; subjective motive irrelevant)
  • Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985) (reasonableness of police actions based on circumstances, not officer state of mind)
  • Perry v. Commonwealth, 280 Va. 572 (2010) (reasonableness standard for investigatory stops; lower than probable cause)
  • Lawrence v. Commonwealth, 40 Va.App. 95 (2003) (permit possibility does not bar investigation of permit status)
  • United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989) (reasonable suspicion standard; less than probable cause required)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Morris v. City of Virginia Beach
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 19, 2011
Citation: 58 Va. App. 173
Docket Number: 0580101
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.